Greetings,
Very interesting topic,
Would love to learn more about geo coding with Wikidata, or maybe even about spatial modeling or creating significant improvements into desired gazeteers &/or geodatabases. Ofcourse, I am not familiar with much of the .rdf output, but maybe we can talk about those summarized efforts towards retreiving spatial attributes using the Wikidata API >? (SPRQL).
-Jorge Hernandez
On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 10:34 AM, wikidata-tech-request@lists.wikimedia.org wrote:
Send Wikidata-tech mailing list submissions to wikidata-tech@lists.wikimedia.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-tech or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to wikidata-tech-request@lists.wikimedia.org
You can reach the person managing the list at wikidata-tech-owner@lists.wikimedia.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Wikidata-tech digest..."
Today's Topics:
- Re: MathML is dead, long live MathML (Thomas Douillard)
- Re: MathML is dead, long live MathML (Peter Krautzberger)
- Re: MathML is dead, long live MathML (Roger Martin)
- Fwd: [Wikidata] upcoming change in RDF format data (Daniel Kinzler)
Message: 1 Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 14:11:13 +0200 From: Thomas Douillard thomas.douillard@gmail.com To: Wikidata technical discussion wikidata-tech@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: Re: [Wikidata-tech] MathML is dead, long live MathML Message-ID: < CAHYhspZx7D-jfoYRPMafah+vmvaDgS0EGYLrjwQBsB9_LbuHLg@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Hi, One concrete usecase is the formula datatype for properties on Wikidata. We are discussing the semantics issues here : what means the operators of the formula, what means the variables ? An immediate way, in Wikidata, is to In the item for a geometric figure, for example a square, how to model that a square can be defined in the euclidian space by the geometric coordinates of points, we could create the item for a point class in Wikidata, give a name of a point (pretty much usual mathematical or programming work) and to link that variable name to an item for the semantics/corresponding type. Same for the operators.
Last, in the question you raised on "modelling maths versus modeling domain model formula" I'd say that in Wikidata the scope is basically unlimited, contrary to a regular scientific publication who takes place in a context that may be more or less non formally explicited, we can fill the gap beetween more formal aspects of logical or inference rules used by the scientist, the mathematical framework (euclidian space, non euclidian space, logical framework, axioms ... we pretty much have items for all of this and can create new one if that's structurally needed for a usecase) and the formula. Time is less of an issue because the work is reusable and cumulative, there is no deadline. There is only a need to leave the door open to do that work for someone to be able to do it at his/her convenance.
Of course it's a lot of work, but there is no pressure. I'm not sure how MathML relates to this however.
2016-04-08 0:51 GMT+02:00 Paul Topping pault@dessci.com:
Peter just posted a follow up response, largely commenting on my
response:
https://www.peterkrautzberger.org/0187/.
First, I suspect the reason his post doesn't get as much discussion as he'd like is because his blog doesn't accept comments. I can understand
why
he doesn't enable comments on his personal blog but why not post it somewhere that DOES accept comments?
He says that most of the discussion has been private. That is not the way to change a standard or replace it by a new one. By all means have your private conversations but don't expect others to agree with any
conclusions
reached in them. The result of good ideas expressed in private
conversation
should be to introduce them into public conversation. Instead, his post treated MathML's failure as a fait accompli. Perhaps it is but only in
the
narrow scope of it being ignored by browser makers.
He feels that many things I said in my reply were more about expressing
my
own ideas. I'll cop to that. I felt that was needed to indicate that
there
are other points of view and other ideas. His solutions may not be the right ones. Let's open up the discussion.
Can we identify specific topics worthy of addressing and discuss them? I tried to hint at some possible directions in my reply, which is why it veered into some of my own ideas. I would love for this to be a constructive discussion. Instead of discussing whether MathML is a failed standard, I would like to see real, open discussion on solutions to
various
problems. Any takers?
Paul
-----Original Message----- From: Paul Topping [mailto:pault@dessci.com] Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2016 2:02 PM To: Daniel Kinzler daniel@brightbyte.de; Moritz Schubotz
<schubotz@tu-
berlin.de>; www-math@w3.org; Peter Krautzberger peter.krautzberger@mathjax.org Cc: Wikimedia developers wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org;
wikidata-tech
wikidata-tech@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: RE: MathML is dead, long live MathML
I have no problem with that but are some of these lists members-only? I
was
told when I replied that my message would be reviewed by the moderator
as
I wasn't a member. Perhaps that was the W3C list.
Paul
-----Original Message----- From: Daniel Kinzler [mailto:daniel@brightbyte.de] Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2016 11:06 AM To: Moritz Schubotz schubotz@tu-berlin.de; www-math@w3.org; Peter Krautzberger peter.krautzberger@mathjax.org Cc: Wikimedia developers wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org;
wikidata-tech
wikidata-tech@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: Re: MathML is dead, long live MathML
Am 07.04.2016 um 20:00 schrieb Moritz Schubotz:
Hi Daniel,
Ok. Let's discuss!
Great! But let's keep the discussion in one place. I made a mess by cross-posting this to two lists, now it's three, it seems. Can we
agree on
wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org as the venue of discussion? At
least
for
the
discussion of MathML in the context of Wikimedia, that would be the
best
place, I think.
-- daniel
Wikidata-tech mailing list Wikidata-tech@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-tech
wikidata-tech@lists.wikimedia.org