Wikivoyage is probably the easiest to start with because of things such as similarity to Wikipedia.
Hazard-SJ
________________________________ From: Federico Leva (Nemo) nemowiki@gmail.com To: Discussion list for the Wikidata project. wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org Cc: Wikidata technical discussion wikidata-tech@lists.wikimedia.org; Ken Snider ksnider@wikimedia.org Sent: Saturday, June 29, 2013 8:22 AM Subject: Re: [Wikidata-tech] [Wikidata-l] WikiVOYAGE deployment plan
legoktm, 28/06/2013 23:45:
Hi Denny, I'm really excited to see a sister project getting included,
+1 I've no idea why start with Wikivoyage, but it's very good that the central interwiki management is being extended to other projects when it's easy to do so (as it would be for Wikiquote and, mutatis mutandis, Commons).
Nemo
however I'm concerned that the community needs a bit more time and notice (I didn't see anything about this on WD:PC). When importing interwiki links for Wikipedias, we had a few months before they were used on client sites. The proposed schedule gives our bots ~3 days to import a majority of links, which I don't think is enough time. A whole week would be much better in my opinion. I've also started a page on-wiki to help coordinate the migration: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Wikivoyage_migration
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-tech mailing list Wikidata-tech@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-tech