On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 1:56 PM, MZMcBride <z(a)mzmcbride.com> wrote:
It's almost as though you're encouraging
bikeshedding.[1] I imagine most
developers don't give a damn what you call it as long as it works well. I'm
certainly in that category.
There are a lot of obstacles to overcome in order to develop a decent,
working translation tool. The focus of any discussion should be on those
actual, real obstacles, not on naming. :-)
I had the same thoughts when I read your e-mail. I was like "ooh,
yay, someone's doing this!" and then I read more and was like "wow,
are we really talking about all of this stuff? so confusing and
pointless. =["
You don't need to come up with complicated names, especially not yet.
:-) Just work on writing it and fixing issues, and then we can think
of coming up with a name that's straightforward and useful.
--
Casey Brown
Cbrown1023