Hi everyone,
At the moment we use Wikimedia infrastructure for most aspects of Pywikipedia (documentation, version management, mailman etc), but not for the bug tracker. Merlijn and I talked a bit about moving to https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org . It's not that we love bugzilla, but that way we have everything in one place making it easy to work together with other people working on Wikimedia/MediaWiki related projects. We should be able to import all open bugs (https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=93107) with a script. What do you think?
Maarten
On 09/06/2012 16:26, Maarten Dammers wrote:
Hi everyone,
At the moment we use Wikimedia infrastructure for most aspects of Pywikipedia (documentation, version management, mailman etc), but not for the bug tracker. Merlijn and I talked a bit about moving to https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org . It's not that we love bugzilla, but that way we have everything in one place making it easy to work together with other people working on Wikimedia/MediaWiki related projects. We should be able to import all open bugs (https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=93107) with a script. What do you think?
Maarten
Pywikipedia-l mailing list Pywikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikipedia-l
Bugzilla is pretty cool, and I'm not a big fan of SourceForge's issue tracker anyway... so I support this move...
-- Lewis Cawte
I proposed this or Jira, which is used on toolserver, a few months back and got some resistance. I still support anything other than what we have but note that wikimedia is transitioning to git, which I believe has its own tracker.
Doug
Sent from my iPhone
On 9 Jun 2012, at 11:51, Lewis Cawte lewiscawte@googlemail.com wrote:
On 09/06/2012 16:26, Maarten Dammers wrote:
Hi everyone,
At the moment we use Wikimedia infrastructure for most aspects of Pywikipedia (documentation, version management, mailman etc), but not for the bug tracker. Merlijn and I talked a bit about moving to https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org . It's not that we love bugzilla, but that way we have everything in one place making it easy to work together with other people working on Wikimedia/MediaWiki related projects. We should be able to import all open bugs (https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=93107) with a script. What do you think?
Maarten
Pywikipedia-l mailing list Pywikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikipedia-l
Bugzilla is pretty cool, and I'm not a big fan of SourceForge's issue tracker anyway... so I support this move...
-- Lewis Cawte
Pywikipedia-l mailing list Pywikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikipedia-l
Hi Doug and Bináris,
Op 9-6-2012 18:31, Doug schreef:
I proposed this or Jira, which is used on toolserver, a few months back and got some resistance.
For me Jira is out because I think that will stop at some point.
I still support anything other than what we have but note that wikimedia is transitioning to git, which I believe has its own tracker.
Git doesn't have it's own tracker, you might be confused by Github (which does have it's own tracker) or you're mixing up Gerrit and Bugzilla. Gerrit is for the code review and doesn't replace bugzilla.
Op 9-6-2012 22:18, Bináris schreef:
Wait a moment. We were told that by the next year every project has to change to git and SVN repository will no longer work at WMM. Some of us are happy with SVN and we may have to move to an SVN-aware site. Do we want to move twice? It's not bad to have everything (bug tracker, source code, documentation) together, but beeing forced to git would perhaps a big price for that. :-)
I would strongly oppose moving the repository to an external site. I would aim at moving to GIT somewhere next year.
Maarten
On 09/06/2012 22:56, Maarten Dammers wrote:
Hi Doug and Bináris,
Op 9-6-2012 18:31, Doug schreef:
I proposed this or Jira, which is used on toolserver, a few months back and got some resistance.
For me Jira is out because I think that will stop at some point.
I still support anything other than what we have but note that wikimedia is transitioning to git, which I believe has its own tracker.
Git doesn't have it's own tracker, you might be confused by Github (which does have it's own tracker) or you're mixing up Gerrit and Bugzilla. Gerrit is for the code review and doesn't replace bugzilla.
Op 9-6-2012 22:18, Bináris schreef:
Wait a moment. We were told that by the next year every project has to change to git and SVN repository will no longer work at WMM. Some of us are happy with SVN and we may have to move to an SVN-aware site. Do we want to move twice? It's not bad to have everything (bug tracker, source code, documentation) together, but beeing forced to git would perhaps a big price for that. :-)
I would strongly oppose moving the repository to an external site. I would aim at moving to GIT somewhere next year.
Agreed, I originally opposed this but I "saw the light" when I was in Berlin, its actually a lot simpler than it looks in my opinion... although I doubt I've really done anything advanced yet...
-- Lewis Cawte
Wait a moment. We were told that by the next year every project has to change to git and SVN repository will no longer work at WMM. Some of us are happy with SVN and we may have to move to an SVN-aware site. Do we want to move twice? It's not bad to have everything (bug tracker, source code, documentation) together, but beeing forced to git would perhaps a big price for that. :-)