Hey, Now we have reports of code coverage in codecov.io <http://codecov.io>. Code coverage is basically percentage of statements executed during tests comparing to all statements in a package. Right now 73% of pywkibot library is covered but only 10% of scripts are being tested. For more detailed report (per file) see this <https://codecov.io/github/wikimedia/pywikibot-core>. Note that Appveyor tests are not included in the report yet <https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/244878>. Some steps that can make pywikibot test coverage better: * Write tests for scripts * site.py, page.py and pagegenerators.py have noticeable number of missing statements <https://codecov.io/github/wikimedia/pywikibot-core/pywikibot?ref=84f5efd03d7fb86eafb6aae1a8af3e0a5cd85a66#sort=missing&dir=desc>. We can write tests for them. * Try coverage suggestions <https://codecov.io/github/wikimedia/pywikibot-core/features/suggestions?ref=84f5efd03d7fb86eafb6aae1a8af3e0a5cd85a66> Let's talk about how we can have better tests! Best _______________________________________________ pywikibot mailing list pywikibot(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikibot

Yes, um, how hard would it be to generate these using not-non-free stuff? <https://wiki.python.org/moin/CodeCoverage> pointed me to <https://coverage.readthedocs.org/en/coverage-4.0.1/> which looked promising.