Le 25 déc. 2011 à 18:09, "Bináris" <wikiposta(a)gmail.com> a écrit :

On Sun, Dec 25, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Bináris <wikiposta(a)gmail.com> wrote: You do indeed need to change it from all those wikis. It is typically something that a bot does well, so the best thing to do (if there are more than a handful of languages involved) is probably to contact a bot owner and let them do it. I have taken this message as such a request, and resolved the Ferenc Farkas issue. However, whether done by bot or manually, there is still the problem that there might be a bot that sees some of the languages before, and others after the change; such a bot would consider the interwiki a 'missing' one on the languages coming afterward, and re-add it. I don't know of an easy way to resolve this, the only thing I can think of is adding an article on the composer on eo:, or on the esperantist on one of the other languages. Or keep an eye at the articles, and keep changing until we get lucky... -- André Engels, andreengels(a)gmail.com

Thank you, André! I think this is a* week point* of our system. Work of Wikipedia is based on the approach that all the mistakes are easier to correct than to prevent. A vandal may "work" on several pages to be vandalized, and I can revert them in a few seconds. Or someone writes an article with a wrong title, I can easily rename it. But here to commit the mistake is easy (one wrong iw into one article), and, by means of bots, the correction gets difficult. This is a *system inversion.* We should invent a systematical solution to this problem. I thought on some hidden comment next to a wrong iw that has a meaning for the bots to pick that iw out of all articles, and never put back. Or just never into that very article. (I just got Dr. Trigon's mail in the minute, that's another approach for the same problem, also a good point to start thinking.) (Personally, I am not good enough in Esperanto to write an article, and Ferenc Farkas, the esperantist would not be notable in any other Wikipedia -- someone who is an esperantist. :-)) -- Bináris

2011/12/26 Andre Engels <andreengels(a)gmail.com> That means the renewal of the whole MediaWiki software, doesn't it? What kind of project is this, and where can I read about it? -- Bináris

Andre Engels <andreengels <at> gmail.com> writes: You mean the Interlanguage extension[1], right? The extension page says it is stable, so maybe the projects just need to start actually using it? [1] https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Interlanguage

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 26.12.2011 11:52, Andre Engels wrote: Also another approach thanks Binaris for mentioning it! The solution with 'Extension:Interlanguage' should be definately the way to go, what about a reply from the developers? I found a request on bugzilla [1] stating (in comment 94); "It's currently targeted to receive a more comprehensive review around March 2012 at which point we'll get a good sense of how realistic a near term roll-out of that is." ...so this may still took a while... :( Regarding the Wikidata, http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/WikiData_WMDE project; as it seams to be it is somehow very unclear about what this exactly is (but may this is just my problem ;)... As far as I can see it should provide an API to give access to all wikipedia content/data. But please correct and extend my statements here... [1] https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15607#c94 Greetings and Happy Holidays!!! DrTrigon

Thank you very much! That's what I remembered! 2011/12/27 &lt;info(a)gno.de&gt; I am selfish enough to be happy with protecting my own wiki. :-))) -- Bináris