I'm in favor of +2ing patches but most of open patches have -1 or -2 in
their code review part.
Best
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 4:54 PM <info(a)gno.de> wrote:
A better way would be to commit some patches. There
are a lot of proposals
which have minor changes and could be approved quickly.
best
xqt
----- Original Nachricht ----
Von: Amir Ladsgroup <ladsgroup(a)gmail.com>
An: Pywikibot discussion list <pywikibot(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
Datum: 09.02.2016 18:10
Betreff: [pywikibot] Number of open changesets
Hello,
Per stats
<https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Gerrit/Reports/Changesets_by_project>.
There are 305 open change sets in pywikibot/core which make us the second
project after mediawiki/core in number of open change sets. Open change
sets won't do any harm but sometimes it's hard to find good patches in
pool
of out-of-date-or-not-needed-anymore patches.
Some projects have rules like "if a change set has -2 for more than N
weeks, it can be abandoned" it can work for us. Also I think if we look
into our own old patches we might find several patches that are not
needed
anymore due to several reasons such as being
implemented another way, too
big schema change in pywikibot, etc. We can abandon them. Please check
your
old patches.
Best
--------------------------------
_______________________________________________
pywikibot mailing list
pywikibot(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikibot