Sorry for doing that. I had to do it but I didn't have time to check
archivebot.py (which is a huge code) and find best fix for it but
builds were failing and we were fixing them one by one.
Anyone interested in fixing archivebot.py bug?
Best
On 7/27/14, info(a)gno.de <info(a)gno.de> wrote:
Ah, maybe. I just saw your "fixes" at my
Talk page(s).
xqt
----- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -----
Von: Amir Ladsgroup
Gesendet: 26.07.2014 23:22
An: Pywikibot discussion list
Betreff: Re: [Pywikipedia-l] The build is broken
it was another bug that John and Ricordisamoa are talking about.
On 7/27/14, info(a)gno.de <info(a)gno.de> wrote:
This is not a bug in testing. The test detects a
bug for archivebot.py
which
fails for unsigned threads.
xqt
----- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -----
Von: John Mark Vandenberg
Gesendet: 26.07.2014 18:21
An: Pywikibot discussion list
Betreff: Re: [Pywikipedia-l] The build is broken
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 10:39 PM, Ricordisamoa
<ricordisamoa(a)openmailbox.org> wrote:
The build is still broken, but because of this edit, that breaks the
timestamp detection of the ArchiveBot.
Maybe a fictitious, write-protected talk page should be used?
That is being tracked on
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67663
An alternative test page would be a good solution.
Or maybe the unit test could allow unsigned sections to be added to
the talk page.
--
John Vandenberg
_______________________________________________
Pywikipedia-l mailing list
Pywikipedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikipedia-l
--
Amir
_______________________________________________
Pywikipedia-l mailing list
Pywikipedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikipedia-l