-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Since xqt! is putting A LOT OF EFFORT into the project to finally
merge trunk with rewrite (at least the bot scripts), you should USE
The only reasons not to do so are:
- - you started using trunk already some while ago
- - you need a function implemented in trunk already and have no time to
port it to rewrite by yourself (and nobody else is willing to do so)
Greetings and have fun with rewrite!
On 22.06.2013 22:21, Merlijn van Deen wrote:
On 21 June 2013 22:43, Chinmay Naik
For our bot, we will be having normal functions like
creating/updating items, claims, sources etc.(the Trunk seems
sufficient for these functions). I have started coding with the
Trunk but now i am a bit concerned about the lifetime about Trunk
branch. Any chances it may be get outdated and then i would have
to port to Release??
It's mostly the backend code that is much cleaner in rewrite. As
such, it is much easier to add/extend functionality, which can be
useful with the changes that happen to wikidata - after all, the
entire infrastructure is still somewhat under development.
Although trunk development will not stop soon, I would suggest to
start new wikidata bots using rewrite, for the reasons above.
I am also concerned about the pace of development of the Rewrite
branch. From another thread, I have noticed about changes to
editEntity() to create items etc...
This is a change to the *wikidata api*. As an end-user of
pywikipedia - trunk or rewrite - you should not notice these
changes. As such, I am not sure why you connect this to 'the pace
of development of the Rewrite branch'.
On 22 June 2013 21:37, Strainu <strainu10(a)gmail.com
2013/6/22 Bináris <wikiposta(a)gmail.com
We have no statistics on users but I think for
some reason that
trunk is more widely used.
The reason is python2, at least for me :)
Could you elaborate on that? Unless you are running an ancient
version of python2 (<= 2.5), there should not be any problems
mailing list Pywikipedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----