Hi all,
I have been trying to estimate as much as possible which reform proposals we expect from the European Commission this year and how they are relevant to us. Of course, political analysis is not the most exact of sciences, so no guarantees :) Still, here is my best guess:
*Geoblocking* May 2016 Possibly a mixture of legislative and non-legislative measures. Could include E-Commerce Directive.
*Audiovisual Media Services Directive * May 2016 Idea of applying national/minority programming quotas that exist for broadcasters and cinemas to online platforms.
*Satellite and Cable Directive * July 2016 Extending scope of "country of origin principle" to the internet. This principle allows content to be broadcast EU-wide by cable or satellite, even if rights have been cleared only in home country, as long as only the home market is "actively targeted".
*Information Society (Copyright) Directive* July 2016 Copyright exceptions and limitations including, hopefully, Freedom of Panorama.
*IPR Enforcement Directive* July 2016 Extending the "communication to the public" definition to internet to internet platforms.
*E-Privacy Directive* September 2016 Everything that has to do with online data protection and online privacy and is not covered by the General Data Protection Regulation.
Cheers from sunny Alicante, Dimi
On 02/03/16 16:13, Dimitar Parvanov Dimitrov wrote:
*Audiovisual Media Services Directive * May 2016 Idea of applying national/minority programming quotas that exist for broadcasters and cinemas to online platforms.
How does that make any sense whatsoever for a website which does not have a broadcasting schedule?
"Before we show you House Of Cards, please be advised that the EU requires that you watch 7.3 minutes of amateur drama in Finnish."
Gerv
I am generally not in favour of such a proposal. However, it is not fully inconceivable to have a quota mandate for pages like youtube and highly frequented pages with suggestions to respect quotas. All I am saying is that technical feasibility is not the issue here :)
Secondly, (major and/or traditional) broadcasters are quick to highlight that it appears ideosyncratic to have the same broadcasting company with the same content under different mandates just because the method of transportation for the content changes from linear to nonlinear content with regards to questions such as advertisement breaks, Closed captioning requirements or language pluralism.
MAthias
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 5:22 PM, Gervase Markham gerv@mozilla.org wrote:
On 02/03/16 16:13, Dimitar Parvanov Dimitrov wrote:
*Audiovisual Media Services Directive * May 2016 Idea of applying national/minority programming quotas that exist for broadcasters and cinemas to online platforms.
How does that make any sense whatsoever for a website which does not have a broadcasting schedule?
"Before we show you House Of Cards, please be advised that the EU requires that you watch 7.3 minutes of amateur drama in Finnish."
Gerv
Publicpolicy mailing list Publicpolicy@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/publicpolicy
publicpolicy@lists.wikimedia.org