In the blog post that Michelle posted it says that both ACLU and Cooley, LLP are working
pro bono. (Which is pretty sweet!) Does that answer your question?
Best,
John
From: publicpolicy-request(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Publicpolicy Digest, Vol 40, Issue 19
To: publicpolicy(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2015 12:00:12 +0000
Send Publicpolicy mailing list submissions to
publicpolicy(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/publicpolicy
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
publicpolicy-request(a)lists.wikimedia.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
publicpolicy-owner(a)lists.wikimedia.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Publicpolicy digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Wikimedia v. NSA Update - District court grants gov't motion
to dismiss (Michelle Paulson)
2. Re: Wikimedia v. NSA Update - District court grants gov't
motion to dismiss (Fæ)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 09:31:38 -0400
From: Michelle Paulson <mpaulson(a)wikimedia.org>
To: publicpolicy(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: [Publicpolicy] Wikimedia v. NSA Update - District court
grants gov't motion to dismiss
Message-ID:
<CAL7R-pvFSgNmZ5pKQu+=GjXhmgh6S9_R3yF2cKA2rax+=TRucA(a)mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Hi All,
Yesterday, a federal district court granted the government's motion to
dismiss our Wikimedia v. NSA
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_v._NSA> case. For those
of you familiar with procedural rules, the Judge T.S. Ellis III dismissed
the case on standing <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standing_%28law%29>
grounds. What this means is that the court believed that we, along with our
co-plaintiffs, were unable to plausibly allege that the NSA is capturing
our communications. The ruling *did not* reach the substance and merits of
the case.
We respectfully disagree with the decision and plan on appealing. This was
not an unexpected outcome at this point in the litigation, and our counsel
at ACLU feel that this is a strong posture for appeal.
We continue to feel that the NSA’s mass surveillance poses a serious threat
to privacy, freedom of expression, and freedom of association -- rights
that are essential to the Wikimedia movement, rights that we will continue
to fight for. We thank the community for all of the support you have shown
for this effort throughout this process.
Please see our blog post
<https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/10/23/wikimedia-v-nsa-lawsuit-dismissal/>
for more information.
-Michelle
==
Michelle Paulson
Legal Director
Wikimedia Foundation
149 New Montgomery Street, 6th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105
mpaulson(a)wikimedia.org
415.839.6885 ext. 6608 (Office)
415.882.0495 (Fax)
*NOTICE: This message may be confidential or legally privileged. If you
have received it by accident, please delete it and let us know about the
mistake. As an attorney for the Wikimedia Foundation and for legal/ethical
reasons, I cannot give legal advice to, or serve as a lawyer for, community
members, volunteers, or staff members in their personal capacity. For more
on what this means, please see our legal disclaimer
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Legal_Disclaimer>.*