Dear list,
The plenary of the European Parliament has just rejected the Legal Affairs Committee with 278-318 votes and 31 abstentions.
This was a roll-call vote so will we know exactly who voted how.
This was a very tiring campaign that took us on an emotional rollercoaster ride. Thanks to all volunteers and staff who helped. I am convinced that it was us and our actions that made the difference of 30 votes possible.
Please remember though, that this just means that the EP will review the text in September in plenary. We will need to make sure amendment proposals are made and they receive a majority.
We will start working on this right away later today, but for the moment you will understand that I need a drink.
Cheers from Strasbourg,
Dimi
Prost and thanks for the hard work, Dimi and all :)
Delphine
Le 5 juil. 2018 à 12:23, à 12:23, Dimitar Parvanov Dimitrov dimitar.parvanov.dimitrov@gmail.com a écrit:
Dear list,
The plenary of the European Parliament has just rejected the Legal Affairs Committee with 278-318 votes and 31 abstentions.
This was a roll-call vote so will we know exactly who voted how.
This was a very tiring campaign that took us on an emotional rollercoaster ride. Thanks to all volunteers and staff who helped. I am convinced that it was us and our actions that made the difference of 30 votes possible.
Please remember though, that this just means that the EP will review the text in September in plenary. We will need to make sure amendment proposals are made and they receive a majority.
We will start working on this right away later today, but for the moment you will understand that I need a drink.
Cheers from Strasbourg,
Dimi
Publicpolicy mailing list Publicpolicy@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/publicpolicy
Dimi, Anna, Federico, thanks so much for your work in Strasbourg over the past couple of days!
And thanks to everybody who helped get us here and open this up for the next campaign. :) [Special shout out also to whoever at Wikimedia Spain had the idea to tag @wikimediapolicy in their tweet that was retweeted more than 2000x and completely broke my notifications.] :)
Cheers!
On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 12:23 PM Dimitar Parvanov Dimitrov < dimitar.parvanov.dimitrov@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear list,
The plenary of the European Parliament has just rejected the Legal Affairs Committee with 278-318 votes and 31 abstentions.
This was a roll-call vote so will we know exactly who voted how.
This was a very tiring campaign that took us on an emotional rollercoaster ride. Thanks to all volunteers and staff who helped. I am convinced that it was us and our actions that made the difference of 30 votes possible.
Please remember though, that this just means that the EP will review the text in September in plenary. We will need to make sure amendment proposals are made and they receive a majority.
We will start working on this right away later today, but for the moment you will understand that I need a drink.
Cheers from Strasbourg,
Dimi _______________________________________________ Publicpolicy mailing list Publicpolicy@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/publicpolicy
Can't come up with anything that Delphine and Jan haven't already said. Thank you for your hard work, and know that y'all are an asset to the movement.
Best regards, Matthias Smed Larsen
Den 05-07-2018 kl. 12:23 skrev Dimitar Parvanov Dimitrov:
Dear list,
The plenary of the European Parliament has just rejected the Legal Affairs Committee with 278-318 votes and 31 abstentions.
This was a roll-call vote so will we know exactly who voted how.
This was a very tiring campaign that took us on an emotional rollercoaster ride. Thanks to all volunteers and staff who helped. I am convinced that it was us and our actions that made the difference of 30 votes possible.
Please remember though, that this just means that the EP will review the text in September in plenary. We will need to make sure amendment proposals are made and they receive a majority.
We will start working on this right away later today, but for the moment you will understand that I need a drink.
Cheers from Strasbourg,
Dimi
http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient Virus-free. www.avg.com http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
Publicpolicy mailing list Publicpolicy@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/publicpolicy
I said that already to some of you, but generally Strasbourg EP is a depressing place… seeing the Wikipedia going dark one after another was so uplifting! I know this was done for the cause, but it was reassuring on the personal level none the less. And it stung the defenders of the existing balance of power where it hurts. It is a privilege and an honor to work with such a motivated community of great integrity. I (but I think all the policy people agree?) are happy to carry your voice forward.
Celebrate, rest, and we will get back to work! :)
Best wishes, Anna
Anna Mazgal EU Policy Advisor Wikimedia anna@wikimedia.be @a2na mobile: +32 487 222 945 51 Rue du Trône BE-1050 Brussels
Wiadomość napisana przez Matthias Smed Larsen matthias@julsmed.dk w dniu 05.07.2018, o godz. 12:34:
Can't come up with anything that Delphine and Jan haven't already said. Thank you for your hard work, and know that y'all are an asset to the movement. Best regards, Matthias Smed Larsen Den 05-07-2018 kl. 12:23 skrev Dimitar Parvanov Dimitrov:
Dear list,
The plenary of the European Parliament has just rejected the Legal Affairs Committee with 278-318 votes and 31 abstentions.
This was a roll-call vote so will we know exactly who voted how.
This was a very tiring campaign that took us on an emotional rollercoaster ride. Thanks to all volunteers and staff who helped. I am convinced that it was us and our actions that made the difference of 30 votes possible.
Please remember though, that this just means that the EP will review the text in September in plenary. We will need to make sure amendment proposals are made and they receive a majority.
We will start working on this right away later today, but for the moment you will understand that I need a drink.
Cheers from Strasbourg,
Dimi
http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient Virus-free. www.avg.com http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient x-msg://3/#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2
Publicpolicy mailing list Publicpolicy@lists.wikimedia.org mailto:Publicpolicy@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/publicpolicy https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/publicpolicy
Publicpolicy mailing list Publicpolicy@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/publicpolicy
Julia Reda has tweeted the roll-call: https://twitter.com/Senficon/status/1014837043225088000, linking to the PDF (see pages 7 and 8) http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-%2f%2fEP%2f%2fNONSGML%2bPV%2b20180705%2bRES-RCV%2bDOC%2bPDF%2bV0%2f%2fEN&language=EN .
Looks like EPP mainly voted +; GUE/NGL, ECR, EFDD and Green–EFA all tended to vote –; ALDE, S&D and ENF were pretty evenly divided; and the Non-Inscrits mainly didn't vote.
(And I thought I sent this forever ago; my bad!)
On Thu, 5 Jul 2018 at 11:44 Anna Mazgal anna@wikimedia.be wrote:
I said that already to some of you, but generally Strasbourg EP is a depressing place… seeing the Wikipedia going dark one after another was so uplifting! I know this was done for the cause, but it was reassuring on the personal level none the less. And it stung the defenders of the existing balance of power where it hurts. It is a privilege and an honor to work with such a motivated community of great integrity. I (but I think all the policy people agree?) are happy to carry your voice forward.
Celebrate, rest, and we will get back to work! :)
Best wishes, Anna
Anna Mazgal EU Policy Advisor Wikimedia anna@wikimedia.be @a2na mobile: +32 487 222 945 51 Rue du Trône BE-1050 Brussels
Wiadomość napisana przez Matthias Smed Larsen matthias@julsmed.dk w dniu 05.07.2018, o godz. 12:34:
Can't come up with anything that Delphine and Jan haven't already said. Thank you for your hard work, and know that y'all are an asset to the movement.
Best regards, Matthias Smed Larsen
Den 05-07-2018 kl. 12:23 skrev Dimitar Parvanov Dimitrov:
Dear list,
The plenary of the European Parliament has just rejected the Legal Affairs Committee with 278-318 votes and 31 abstentions.
This was a roll-call vote so will we know exactly who voted how.
This was a very tiring campaign that took us on an emotional rollercoaster ride. Thanks to all volunteers and staff who helped. I am convinced that it was us and our actions that made the difference of 30 votes possible.
Please remember though, that this just means that the EP will review the text in September in plenary. We will need to make sure amendment proposals are made and they receive a majority.
We will start working on this right away later today, but for the moment you will understand that I need a drink.
Cheers from Strasbourg,
Dimi
http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient Virus-free. www.avg.com http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient
Publicpolicy mailing listPublicpolicy@lists.wikimedia.orghttps://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/publicpolicy
Publicpolicy mailing list Publicpolicy@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/publicpolicy
Publicpolicy mailing list Publicpolicy@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/publicpolicy
Data available at http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-%2f%2fEP%2f%2fNONSGML%...
On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 3:21 PM Owen Blacker owen@openrightsgroup.org wrote:
Julia Reda has tweeted the roll-call: https://twitter.com/Senficon/status/1014837043225088000, linking to the PDF (see pages 7 and 8) http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-%2f%2fEP%2f%2fNONSGML%2bPV%2b20180705%2bRES-RCV%2bDOC%2bPDF%2bV0%2f%2fEN&language=EN .
Looks like EPP mainly voted +; GUE/NGL, ECR, EFDD and Green–EFA all tended to vote –; ALDE, S&D and ENF were pretty evenly divided; and the Non-Inscrits mainly didn't vote.
(And I thought I sent this forever ago; my bad!)
On Thu, 5 Jul 2018 at 11:44 Anna Mazgal anna@wikimedia.be wrote:
I said that already to some of you, but generally Strasbourg EP is a depressing place… seeing the Wikipedia going dark one after another was so uplifting! I know this was done for the cause, but it was reassuring on the personal level none the less. And it stung the defenders of the existing balance of power where it hurts. It is a privilege and an honor to work with such a motivated community of great integrity. I (but I think all the policy people agree?) are happy to carry your voice forward.
Celebrate, rest, and we will get back to work! :)
Best wishes, Anna
Anna Mazgal EU Policy Advisor Wikimedia anna@wikimedia.be @a2na mobile: +32 487 222 945 51 Rue du Trône BE-1050 Brussels
Wiadomość napisana przez Matthias Smed Larsen matthias@julsmed.dk w dniu 05.07.2018, o godz. 12:34:
Can't come up with anything that Delphine and Jan haven't already said. Thank you for your hard work, and know that y'all are an asset to the movement.
Best regards, Matthias Smed Larsen
Den 05-07-2018 kl. 12:23 skrev Dimitar Parvanov Dimitrov:
Dear list,
The plenary of the European Parliament has just rejected the Legal Affairs Committee with 278-318 votes and 31 abstentions.
This was a roll-call vote so will we know exactly who voted how.
This was a very tiring campaign that took us on an emotional rollercoaster ride. Thanks to all volunteers and staff who helped. I am convinced that it was us and our actions that made the difference of 30 votes possible.
Please remember though, that this just means that the EP will review the text in September in plenary. We will need to make sure amendment proposals are made and they receive a majority.
We will start working on this right away later today, but for the moment you will understand that I need a drink.
Cheers from Strasbourg,
Dimi
http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient Virus-free. www.avg.com http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient
Publicpolicy mailing listPublicpolicy@lists.wikimedia.orghttps://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/publicpolicy
Publicpolicy mailing list Publicpolicy@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/publicpolicy
Publicpolicy mailing list Publicpolicy@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/publicpolicy
Publicpolicy mailing list Publicpolicy@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/publicpolicy
This is a huge achievement.
Since ACTA the massed ranks of big media lobbyists have undoubtedly planned to ensure they would never lose like that again. Moreover some of the beneficiaries of today's decision are unloved bug tech companies, so voting to support their cause wasn't to be taken for granted.
which makes this all the more impressive for the non profit sector. The battle is not over so I wish you recharged batteries over the summer
On Thu, 5 Jul 2018, 15:23 Mathias Schindler, mathias.schindler@gmail.com wrote:
Data available at http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-%2f%2fEP%2f%2fNONSGML%...
On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 3:21 PM Owen Blacker owen@openrightsgroup.org wrote:
Julia Reda has tweeted the roll-call: https://twitter.com/Senficon/status/1014837043225088000, linking to the PDF (see pages 7 and 8) http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-%2f%2fEP%2f%2fNONSGML%2bPV%2b20180705%2bRES-RCV%2bDOC%2bPDF%2bV0%2f%2fEN&language=EN .
Looks like EPP mainly voted +; GUE/NGL, ECR, EFDD and Green–EFA all tended to vote –; ALDE, S&D and ENF were pretty evenly divided; and the Non-Inscrits mainly didn't vote.
(And I thought I sent this forever ago; my bad!)
On Thu, 5 Jul 2018 at 11:44 Anna Mazgal anna@wikimedia.be wrote:
I said that already to some of you, but generally Strasbourg EP is a depressing place… seeing the Wikipedia going dark one after another was so uplifting! I know this was done for the cause, but it was reassuring on the personal level none the less. And it stung the defenders of the existing balance of power where it hurts. It is a privilege and an honor to work with such a motivated community of great integrity. I (but I think all the policy people agree?) are happy to carry your voice forward.
Celebrate, rest, and we will get back to work! :)
Best wishes, Anna
Anna Mazgal EU Policy Advisor Wikimedia anna@wikimedia.be @a2na mobile: +32 487 222 945 51 Rue du Trône BE-1050 Brussels
Wiadomość napisana przez Matthias Smed Larsen matthias@julsmed.dk w dniu 05.07.2018, o godz. 12:34:
Can't come up with anything that Delphine and Jan haven't already said. Thank you for your hard work, and know that y'all are an asset to the movement.
Best regards, Matthias Smed Larsen
Den 05-07-2018 kl. 12:23 skrev Dimitar Parvanov Dimitrov:
Dear list,
The plenary of the European Parliament has just rejected the Legal Affairs Committee with 278-318 votes and 31 abstentions.
This was a roll-call vote so will we know exactly who voted how.
This was a very tiring campaign that took us on an emotional rollercoaster ride. Thanks to all volunteers and staff who helped. I am convinced that it was us and our actions that made the difference of 30 votes possible.
Please remember though, that this just means that the EP will review the text in September in plenary. We will need to make sure amendment proposals are made and they receive a majority.
We will start working on this right away later today, but for the moment you will understand that I need a drink.
Cheers from Strasbourg,
Dimi
http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient Virus-free. www.avg.com http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient
Publicpolicy mailing listPublicpolicy@lists.wikimedia.orghttps://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/publicpolicy
Publicpolicy mailing list Publicpolicy@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/publicpolicy
Publicpolicy mailing list Publicpolicy@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/publicpolicy
Publicpolicy mailing list Publicpolicy@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/publicpolicy
Publicpolicy mailing list Publicpolicy@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/publicpolicy
Hello all,
If I well understand, the amendment proposals referred to in this message will be done at the Legal Affairs Committee, before the next part-session in September, and the whole thing will then be presented at the plenary for debate (not vote) at that part-session. Is this correct?
Paulo
2018-07-05 11:23 GMT+01:00 Dimitar Parvanov Dimitrov < dimitar.parvanov.dimitrov@gmail.com>:
Dear list,
The plenary of the European Parliament has just rejected the Legal Affairs Committee with 278-318 votes and 31 abstentions.
This was a roll-call vote so will we know exactly who voted how.
This was a very tiring campaign that took us on an emotional rollercoaster ride. Thanks to all volunteers and staff who helped. I am convinced that it was us and our actions that made the difference of 30 votes possible.
Please remember though, that this just means that the EP will review the text in September in plenary. We will need to make sure amendment proposals are made and they receive a majority.
We will start working on this right away later today, but for the moment you will understand that I need a drink.
Cheers from Strasbourg,
Dimi
Publicpolicy mailing list Publicpolicy@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/publicpolicy
@Paulo
Next steps: 1. Until 5 September new amendments can be filed. (by any 36MEPs, any political group or by Catherine Stihler on behalf of IMCO on Article 13). 2. Plenary debate and vote on 11, 12 or 13 September.
2018-07-06 21:44 GMT+02:00 Paulo Santos Perneta paulosperneta@gmail.com:
Hello all,
If I well understand, the amendment proposals referred to in this message will be done at the Legal Affairs Committee, before the next part-session in September, and the whole thing will then be presented at the plenary for debate (not vote) at that part-session. Is this correct?
Paulo
2018-07-05 11:23 GMT+01:00 Dimitar Parvanov Dimitrov < dimitar.parvanov.dimitrov@gmail.com>:
Dear list,
The plenary of the European Parliament has just rejected the Legal Affairs Committee with 278-318 votes and 31 abstentions.
This was a roll-call vote so will we know exactly who voted how.
This was a very tiring campaign that took us on an emotional rollercoaster ride. Thanks to all volunteers and staff who helped. I am convinced that it was us and our actions that made the difference of 30 votes possible.
Please remember though, that this just means that the EP will review the text in September in plenary. We will need to make sure amendment proposals are made and they receive a majority.
We will start working on this right away later today, but for the moment you will understand that I need a drink.
Cheers from Strasbourg,
Dimi
Publicpolicy mailing list Publicpolicy@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/publicpolicy
Publicpolicy mailing list Publicpolicy@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/publicpolicy
publicpolicy@lists.wikimedia.org