Thank you, Dimi, this is very helpful.
Government freedom of information and Wikipedia is indicated as top importance, but Jimmy Wales recently indicated that we should not release logs about what IP addresses assigned to specific public agencies have been reading. I am okay with that, but there are other issues recently involving an editor from the EPA responsible for pesticide testing trying to downplay the toxicity of the neonicotinoids, and do I ever have a story to tell you about depleted uranium, but per the following I have become very eventualist about it:
http://www.iom.edu/Reports/2013/Gulf-War-and-HealthTreatment-for-Chronic-Mul...
http://www.gulflink.osd.mil/medsearch/Cancer/DoD122.shtml
http://www.smj.org.sa/PDFFiles/May12/Uranium.pdf
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1242351/
http://www.marciainhorn.com/olwp/wp-content/uploads/Effect-of-war-on-fertili...
http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/10/04/are-scientists-being-muzzled-a-look-at-th...
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/earth-insight/2013/oct/13/world-healt...
I would be very interested to learn your thoughts on the top priorities.
Best regards, James Salsman
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Dimitar Parvanov Dimitrov dimitar.parvanov.dimitrov@gmail.com wrote:
Salut la liste!
At this year's Wikimania in Hong Kong we launched a survey targeted mainly at Wikimedians asking them which policy issues are most important to them. We had 137 people filling out the questionnarie, which is a decent number for a first go. A summary of the results, as well as the full data itself can be accessed via a dedicated meta page [1].
As with everything else, fell free to share, copy re-mix and re-use as you see fit.
Greeting from Brussels! Dimi
[1]https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/EU_policy/Survey
Advocacy_Advisors mailing list Advocacy_Advisors@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/advocacy_advisors