And coincidentally, EFF published an interview with Michelle on this topic on Friday: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2013/07/cda-230-success-cases-wikipedia
Good summary of why this issue matters to WM.
Luis
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Luis Villa lvilla@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hi, all-
As some of you certainly know, Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act[1] is a key legal tool that we use to protect speech on Wikipedia.
A group of state-level attorney generals have recently asked the US federal government to weaken Sec. 230. A couple of organizations have weighed in on the proposal:
CDT: https://www.cdt.org/blogs/andrew-mcdiarmid/2507section-230-under-attack-stat...
EFF: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2013/07/state-ags-threaten-gut-cda-230-speech-...
And a more academic take from Eric Goldman: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2287622&download=yes
This is fairly core to what we do, obviously, so Stephen and I are monitoring it closely. Your involvement (questions, proposals for action, proposals for inaction, etc.) is (as always!) welcome.
Luis
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Section_230_of_the_Communications_Decency_Act
-- Luis Villa Deputy General Counsel Wikimedia Foundation 415.839.6885 ext. 6810
NOTICE: *This message may be confidential or legally privileged. If you have received it by accident, please delete it and let us know about the mistake. As an attorney for the Wikimedia Foundation, for legal/ethical reasons I cannot give legal advice to, or serve as a lawyer for, community members, volunteers, or staff members in their personal capacity.*