Amgine wrote:
... You're okay with allowing parts of governments to browse/edit privately, but not make this service general to all?
When I asked for universal private browsing, Foundation Legal staff accused me of trying to frustrate the NSA. I am not sure whether there has been a reply to my question about how asking them to come in to compliance with the law is more frustrating than helpful to them. In the mean time, I would rather address specific instances of government attempts to conceal information by editing Wikipedia. Again, this is a very eventualist attitude and I worry that it may be too eventualist.
Best regards, James Salsman
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Mathias Schindler mathias.schindler@wikimedia.de wrote:
2013/10/22 James Salsman jsalsman@gmail.com:
I would be very interested to learn your thoughts on the top priorities.
It could be fun exercise to ask you how long it takes for the average brain to connect the topic of Freedom of Information with specific editing behaviour of government employees in Wikipedia. I am afraid of the answer.
Mathias
-- Mathias Schindler Projektmanager Wikimedia Deutschland e.V. web: http://www.wikimedia.de mail: mathias.schindler@wikimedia.de
Ceterum censeo opera officiales esse liberandam - http://urheberrecht.wikimedia.de/
Wikimedia Deutschland - Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e. V. Eingetragen im Vereinsregister des Amtsgerichts Berlin-Charlottenburg unter der Nummer 23855 B. Als gemeinnützig anerkannt durch das Finanzamt für Körperschaften I Berlin, Steuernummer 27/681/51985.
Advocacy_Advisors mailing list Advocacy_Advisors@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/advocacy_advisors