We tend to go out pontificating on these lists. What would be helpful is solutioning. For net neutrality, how would you reconcile the need for free public access to information with the ideals of net neutrality? This is the library analogy. We believe libraries should exist in this new digital world. Do you advise that they cannot? And if they can, how should we articulate this better?
Go ahead and take a stab at it.
L On Aug 4, 2014 1:29 PM, "Juergen Fenn" schneeschmelze@googlemail.com wrote:
2014-08-03 22:22 GMT+02:00 Jens Best jens.best@wikimedia.de:
We as WMDE have not yet written a formal position on this special
subject,
but be assured that net neutrality is a very important subject for us.
As a German community member with no affiliation to the German chapter or indeed any other Wikimedia organisation I would like to add that net neutrality is indeed a rather important issue to anyone interested in the politics of the information economy in this country. I presume no one would tolerate a breach of net neutrality anywhere, and it is a bad sign if Wikimedia is associated with something like that in the first place.
However, there is a long-standing discussion on legally constituting libraries as a statutory basic public service in this country. So, the discussion on the introduction of library acts, or a Bibliotheksgesetz, in all German länder as well as on the Federal level would be the right way to address the issue of how to offer free access to information for everyone. I have a hunch that this might hold true for other countries, too. Wikipedia Zero seems to have been designed too much with a U.S. perspective in mind. That's why it is bound to fail in other parts of the world.
Regards, Jürgen.
Advocacy_Advisors mailing list Advocacy_Advisors@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/advocacy_advisors