To be clear, when I said "I agree" I meant that I agree that it is the wrong tool. So Amgine and I agree (not sure about Aktron, but I think he also agrees).
I could see a time when using sitenotice for copyright advocacy could be appropriate - but it would have to be a very specific, targeted issue, where timely action by a large number of people could make a very large impact. This clearly is not that sort of thing.
Luis
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:23 PM, Amgine amgine@wikimedians.ca wrote:
I don't agree with using the SiteNotice. Over-use of this tool is encouraging people to ignore it, and to block it. The practice of the WMF to arbitrarily clear user preferences to close central notice pisses people off.
IMO central notice should only be used in a life-or-death situation. This isn't it.
Amgine
On 12 Feb 2014, at 9:56, Luis Villa lvilla@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 4:11 AM, aktron@centrum.cz wrote: Luis,
Some of the people (outside of WM community) suggested that it might be
a good idea to promote this via SiteNotidce. But I think it is quite a brutal tool.
I agree. Does anyone else have other suggestions?
Btw.: What do you mean by "load into"? I mean, I already did the Czech
translation for copywrongs and I know the youcan.fixcopyright.eu but a question remains ... what is the thing you wanted to do by "loading"?
I meant "whatever it takes to get the content into the tool" - don't
know if it is in git, in a wiki, maintained by hand, etc. Presumably someone has to do some work to make the answers appear on the site :)
Luis
Jan
Advocacy_Advisors mailing list Advocacy_Advisors@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/advocacy_advisors