Please review the DRAFT form. Do tell me what to add/change/remove.
https://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?formkey=dHFGSEljVlBjUDlOdVZPWGV6TmR...
https://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?formkey=dHFGSEljVlBjUDlOdVZPWGV6TmRkaGc6MQ Thanks!
Asaf
At SJ's suggestion, added open questions in a separate form (to maximize respondents)
Draft Questionnaire - part 1 (multiple choice): https://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?formkey=dHFGSEljVlBjUDlOdVZPWGV6TmR...
Draft Questionnaire - part 2 (open questions): https://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?formkey=dFNScGszQWFVRnNWZHNZVE05RnA...
PLEASE COMMENT.
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Asaf Bartov asaf.bartov@gmail.com wrote:
Please review the DRAFT form. Do tell me what to add/change/remove.
https://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?formkey=dHFGSEljVlBjUDlOdVZPWGV6TmR...
https://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?formkey=dHFGSEljVlBjUDlOdVZPWGV6TmRkaGc6MQ Thanks!
Asaf-- Asaf Bartov asaf.bartov@gmail.com
Hi Asaf,
great work!
Forthe MC survey, could you please for the "if yes" question add two radiobuttons with yes/no ? Then we know whether someone meant no, or just was lazy.
You could possibly add links (opening in a new window?) to the strategywiki to explain the terms you used. To make sure everybody has the same understanding.
For the quality option, Option 4 should be Other?
The mailing list about movement roles would be announcement only I assume? I would add that to be clear. I.e., no discussions. If they say yes, what about asking their email address? Then we can immediately subscribe them.
I assume that the open questions Questionnair is not finished yet? The questions are all identical :)
Thanks again for the good work, I like the MC one very much. Adding an encouragement on the top that they can add extra options would probably remove the need for the extra survey. KISS.
Best,
Lodewijk
2011/3/24 Asaf Bartov asaf.bartov@gmail.com
At SJ's suggestion, added open questions in a separate form (to maximize respondents)
Draft Questionnaire - part 1 (multiple choice):
https://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?formkey=dHFGSEljVlBjUDlOdVZPWGV6TmR...
Draft Questionnaire - part 2 (open questions):
https://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?formkey=dFNScGszQWFVRnNWZHNZVE05RnA...
PLEASE COMMENT.
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Asaf Bartov asaf.bartov@gmail.comwrote:
Please review the DRAFT form. Do tell me what to add/change/remove.
https://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?formkey=dHFGSEljVlBjUDlOdVZPWGV6TmR...
https://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?formkey=dHFGSEljVlBjUDlOdVZPWGV6TmRkaGc6MQ Thanks!
Asaf-- Asaf Bartov asaf.bartov@gmail.com
-- Asaf Bartov asaf.bartov@gmail.com
Movementroles mailing list Movementroles@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/movementroles
Hi Asaf
+1 to Lodewijk's comments.
The links to strategy wiki is a great idea. Might we want to add in either the survey or the covering email a link to our page on meta?
One difference is that I see different questions when I look a survey 2 ... are there different version?
One minor point: I'm seeing some text in German saying "* Erforderlich" etc. Before sending it out, might it be possible to put everything into English?
Cheers
Jon
Jon Huggett +44-795-278-0688 +1-415-465-2700 jon@huggett.com www.huggett.com Skype jon.huggett
On 2011 Mar 25, at 8:03 , Lodewijk wrote:
Hi Asaf,
great work!
Forthe MC survey, could you please for the "if yes" question add two radiobuttons with yes/no ? Then we know whether someone meant no, or just was lazy.
You could possibly add links (opening in a new window?) to the strategywiki to explain the terms you used. To make sure everybody has the same understanding.
For the quality option, Option 4 should be Other?
The mailing list about movement roles would be announcement only I assume? I would add that to be clear. I.e., no discussions. If they say yes, what about asking their email address? Then we can immediately subscribe them.
I assume that the open questions Questionnair is not finished yet? The questions are all identical :)
Thanks again for the good work, I like the MC one very much. Adding an encouragement on the top that they can add extra options would probably remove the need for the extra survey. KISS.
Best,
Lodewijk
2011/3/24 Asaf Bartov asaf.bartov@gmail.com At SJ's suggestion, added open questions in a separate form (to maximize respondents)
Draft Questionnaire - part 1 (multiple choice): https://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?formkey=dHFGSEljVlBjUDlOdVZPWGV6TmR...
Draft Questionnaire - part 2 (open questions): https://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?formkey=dFNScGszQWFVRnNWZHNZVE05RnA...
PLEASE COMMENT.
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Asaf Bartov asaf.bartov@gmail.com wrote: Please review the DRAFT form. Do tell me what to add/change/remove.
https://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?formkey=dHFGSEljVlBjUDlOdVZPWGV6TmR...
Thanks!
Asaf-- Asaf Bartov asaf.bartov@gmail.com
-- Asaf Bartov asaf.bartov@gmail.com
Movementroles mailing list Movementroles@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/movementroles
Movementroles mailing list Movementroles@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/movementroles
I like this. Definitely worth posting to the chapters.
I'd like to post a similar version to the world linked from meta and posted to foundation-l -- could these be tagged somehow as coming from different sources? as a cloned version of the survey with complementary data sets?
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 3:25 AM, Jon Huggett jon.huggett@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Asaf +1 to Lodewijk's comments. The links to strategy wiki is a great idea. Might we want to add in either the survey or the covering email a link to our page on meta? One difference is that I see different questions when I look a survey 2 ... are there different version? One minor point: I'm seeing some text in German saying "* Erforderlich" etc. Before sending it out, might it be possible to put everything into English? Cheers Jon
Jon Huggett +44-795-278-0688 +1-415-465-2700 jon@huggett.com www.huggett.com Skype jon.huggett
On 2011 Mar 25, at 8:03 , Lodewijk wrote:
Hi Asaf, great work! Forthe MC survey, could you please for the "if yes" question add two radiobuttons with yes/no ? Then we know whether someone meant no, or just was lazy. You could possibly add links (opening in a new window?) to the strategywiki to explain the terms you used. To make sure everybody has the same understanding. For the quality option, Option 4 should be Other? The mailing list about movement roles would be announcement only I assume? I would add that to be clear. I.e., no discussions. If they say yes, what about asking their email address? Then we can immediately subscribe them. I assume that the open questions Questionnair is not finished yet? The questions are all identical :) Thanks again for the good work, I like the MC one very much. Adding an encouragement on the top that they can add extra options would probably remove the need for the extra survey. KISS. Best, Lodewijk
2011/3/24 Asaf Bartov asaf.bartov@gmail.com
At SJ's suggestion, added open questions in a separate form (to maximize respondents) Draft Questionnaire - part 1 (multiple choice):
https://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?formkey=dHFGSEljVlBjUDlOdVZPWGV6TmR... Draft Questionnaire - part 2 (open questions):
https://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?formkey=dFNScGszQWFVRnNWZHNZVE05RnA... PLEASE COMMENT. On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Asaf Bartov asaf.bartov@gmail.com wrote:
Please review the DRAFT form. Do tell me what to add/change/remove.
https://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?formkey=dHFGSEljVlBjUDlOdVZPWGV6TmR... Thanks!
Asaf
Asaf Bartov asaf.bartov@gmail.com
-- Asaf Bartov asaf.bartov@gmail.com
Movementroles mailing list Movementroles@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/movementroles
Movementroles mailing list Movementroles@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/movementroles
Movementroles mailing list Movementroles@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/movementroles
Lodewijk: Done.
Jon: the German is just Google playing geographical-IP-based interface tricks on you. I used no German in the form, ja?
SJ: creating a separate (identical) version of the two parts for the general public is zero-effort, so sure.
Waiting for more comments from MR people, or for an explicit encouragement to start spreading it among WMCON attendees.
Cheers,
Asaf
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Lodewijk lodewijk@effeietsanders.orgwrote:
Hi Asaf,
great work!
Forthe MC survey, could you please for the "if yes" question add two radiobuttons with yes/no ? Then we know whether someone meant no, or just was lazy.
You could possibly add links (opening in a new window?) to the strategywiki to explain the terms you used. To make sure everybody has the same understanding.
For the quality option, Option 4 should be Other?
The mailing list about movement roles would be announcement only I assume? I would add that to be clear. I.e., no discussions. If they say yes, what about asking their email address? Then we can immediately subscribe them.
I assume that the open questions Questionnair is not finished yet? The questions are all identical :)
Thanks again for the good work, I like the MC one very much. Adding an encouragement on the top that they can add extra options would probably remove the need for the extra survey. KISS.
Best,
Lodewijk
2011/3/24 Asaf Bartov asaf.bartov@gmail.com
At SJ's suggestion, added open questions in a separate form (to maximize respondents)
Draft Questionnaire - part 1 (multiple choice):
https://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?formkey=dHFGSEljVlBjUDlOdVZPWGV6TmR...
Draft Questionnaire - part 2 (open questions):
https://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?formkey=dFNScGszQWFVRnNWZHNZVE05RnA...
PLEASE COMMENT.
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Asaf Bartov asaf.bartov@gmail.comwrote:
Please review the DRAFT form. Do tell me what to add/change/remove.
https://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?formkey=dHFGSEljVlBjUDlOdVZPWGV6TmR...
https://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?formkey=dHFGSEljVlBjUDlOdVZPWGV6TmRkaGc6MQ Thanks!
Asaf-- Asaf Bartov asaf.bartov@gmail.com
-- Asaf Bartov asaf.bartov@gmail.com
Movementroles mailing list Movementroles@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/movementroles
Hi Asaf, I am very impressed of the result and I am pretty sure that this doesn't need to be overviewed until it is absolutely perfect. I cannont find any mistakes oder difficulties and would like to see it spreaded out a early as possible.
Viele Grüße, Alice.
Am 25.03.2011 um 11:05 schrieb Asaf Bartov asaf.bartov@gmail.com:
Lodewijk: Done.
Jon: the German is just Google playing geographical-IP-based interface tricks on you. I used no German in the form, ja?
SJ: creating a separate (identical) version of the two parts for the general public is zero-effort, so sure.
Waiting for more comments from MR people, or for an explicit encouragement to start spreading it among WMCON attendees.
Cheers,
Asaf
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Lodewijk lodewijk@effeietsanders.orgwrote:
Hi Asaf,
great work!
Forthe MC survey, could you please for the "if yes" question add two radiobuttons with yes/no ? Then we know whether someone meant no, or just was lazy.
You could possibly add links (opening in a new window?) to the strategywiki to explain the terms you used. To make sure everybody has the same understanding.
For the quality option, Option 4 should be Other?
The mailing list about movement roles would be announcement only I assume? I would add that to be clear. I.e., no discussions. If they say yes, what about asking their email address? Then we can immediately subscribe them.
I assume that the open questions Questionnair is not finished yet? The questions are all identical :)
Thanks again for the good work, I like the MC one very much. Adding an encouragement on the top that they can add extra options would probably remove the need for the extra survey. KISS.
Best,
Lodewijk
2011/3/24 Asaf Bartov asaf.bartov@gmail.com
At SJ's suggestion, added open questions in a separate form (to maximize respondents)
Draft Questionnaire - part 1 (multiple choice):
https://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?formkey=dHFGSEljVlBjUDlOdVZPWGV6TmR...
Draft Questionnaire - part 2 (open questions):
https://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?formkey=dFNScGszQWFVRnNWZHNZVE05RnA...
PLEASE COMMENT.
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Asaf Bartov asaf.bartov@gmail.comwrote:
Please review the DRAFT form. Do tell me what to add/change/remove.
https://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?formkey=dHFGSEljVlBjUDlOdVZPWGV6TmR...
https://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?formkey=dHFGSEljVlBjUDlOdVZPWGV6TmRkaGc6MQ Thanks!
Asaf-- Asaf Bartov asaf.bartov@gmail.com
-- Asaf Bartov asaf.bartov@gmail.com
Movementroles mailing list Movementroles@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/movementroles
Agreed, lets get it movementing!
Lodewijk
2011/3/25 Alice Wiegand me.lyzzy@googlemail.com
Hi Asaf, I am very impressed of the result and I am pretty sure that this doesn't need to be overviewed until it is absolutely perfect. I cannont find any mistakes oder difficulties and would like to see it spreaded out a early as possible.
Viele Grüße, Alice.
Am 25.03.2011 um 11:05 schrieb Asaf Bartov asaf.bartov@gmail.com:
Lodewijk: Done.
Jon: the German is just Google playing geographical-IP-based interface tricks on you. I used no German in the form, ja?
SJ: creating a separate (identical) version of the two parts for the general public is zero-effort, so sure.
Waiting for more comments from MR people, or for an explicit encouragement to start spreading it among WMCON attendees.
Cheers,
Asaf
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Lodewijk < lodewijk@effeietsanders.org lodewijk@effeietsanders.org> wrote:
Hi Asaf,
great work!
Forthe MC survey, could you please for the "if yes" question add two radiobuttons with yes/no ? Then we know whether someone meant no, or just was lazy.
You could possibly add links (opening in a new window?) to the strategywiki to explain the terms you used. To make sure everybody has the same understanding.
For the quality option, Option 4 should be Other?
The mailing list about movement roles would be announcement only I assume? I would add that to be clear. I.e., no discussions. If they say yes, what about asking their email address? Then we can immediately subscribe them.
I assume that the open questions Questionnair is not finished yet? The questions are all identical :)
Thanks again for the good work, I like the MC one very much. Adding an encouragement on the top that they can add extra options would probably remove the need for the extra survey. KISS.
Best,
Lodewijk
2011/3/24 Asaf Bartov < asaf.bartov@gmail.comasaf.bartov@gmail.com>
At SJ's suggestion, added open questions in a separate form (to maximize respondents)
Draft Questionnaire - part 1 (multiple choice): https://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?formkey=dHFGSEljVlBjUDlOdVZPWGV6TmRkaGc6MQ https://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?formkey=dHFGSEljVlBjUDlOdVZPWGV6TmR...
Draft Questionnaire - part 2 (open questions): https://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?formkey=dFNScGszQWFVRnNWZHNZVE05RnA2UlE6MQ https://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?formkey=dFNScGszQWFVRnNWZHNZVE05RnA...
PLEASE COMMENT.
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Asaf Bartov < asaf.bartov@gmail.com asaf.bartov@gmail.com> wrote:
Please review the DRAFT form. Do tell me what to add/change/remove.
https://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?formkey=dHFGSEljVlBjUDlOdVZPWGV6TmRkaGc6MQ https://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?formkey=dHFGSEljVlBjUDlOdVZPWGV6TmR...
https://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?formkey=dHFGSEljVlBjUDlOdVZPWGV6TmRkaGc6MQ Thanks!
Asaf-- Asaf Bartov < asaf.bartov@gmail.comasaf.bartov@gmail.com>
-- Asaf Bartov < asaf.bartov@gmail.comasaf.bartov@gmail.com>
Movementroles mailing list Movementroles@lists.wikimedia.orgMovementroles@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/movementroles https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/movementroles
-- Asaf Bartov < asaf.bartov@gmail.comasaf.bartov@gmail.com>
Movementroles mailing list Movementroles@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/movementroles
Movementroles mailing list Movementroles@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/movementroles
All of the issues I might have had have already been addressed, so I say go with it!
Austin
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 7:39 PM, Asaf Bartov asaf.bartov@gmail.com wrote:
At SJ's suggestion, added open questions in a separate form (to maximize respondents) Draft Questionnaire - part 1 (multiple choice): https://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?formkey=dHFGSEljVlBjUDlOdVZPWGV6TmR... Draft Questionnaire - part 2 (open questions): https://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?formkey=dFNScGszQWFVRnNWZHNZVE05RnA... PLEASE COMMENT. On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Asaf Bartov asaf.bartov@gmail.com wrote:
Please review the DRAFT form. Do tell me what to add/change/remove.
https://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?formkey=dHFGSEljVlBjUDlOdVZPWGV6TmR... Thanks!
Asaf
Asaf Bartov asaf.bartov@gmail.com
-- Asaf Bartov asaf.bartov@gmail.com
Movementroles mailing list Movementroles@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/movementroles
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 7:39 PM, Asaf Bartov asaf.bartov@gmail.com wrote:
At SJ's suggestion, added open questions in a separate form (to maximize respondents) Draft Questionnaire - part 1 (multiple choice): https://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?formkey=dHFGSEljVlBjUDlOdVZPWGV6TmR... Draft Questionnaire - part 2 (open questions): https://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?formkey=dFNScGszQWFVRnNWZHNZVE05RnA... PLEASE COMMENT.
Great stuff! Thank you very much, Asaf any everybody who contributed to it.
Arne
Asaf,
can you add that answers will be public?
I would really like to be able to put some of the thoughts on meta to feed the dsicussion.
Thanks,
Delphine
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 7:02 PM, Asaf Bartov asaf.bartov@gmail.com wrote:
Please review the DRAFT form. Do tell me what to add/change/remove. https://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?formkey=dHFGSEljVlBjUDlOdVZPWGV6TmR... Thanks!
Asaf
Asaf Bartov asaf.bartov@gmail.com
Movementroles mailing list Movementroles@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/movementroles
Sorry for being so late on this...
I'm actually thinking that making the field "organisation" obligatory may keep some people from answering the survey, as they haven't had time to "talk" about this with their chapter and probably won't want to engage their chapter in this.
Possible ideas: *not make that field obligatory *add a "personal opinion" check box which allows people to give their personal opinion *make the name field obligatory and state that answers to this survey engage the respondant and noone else.
Whatcha think?
Delphine
2011/3/25 Delphine Ménard notafishz@gmail.com:
Asaf,
can you add that answers will be public?
I would really like to be able to put some of the thoughts on meta to feed the dsicussion.
Thanks,
Delphine
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 7:02 PM, Asaf Bartov asaf.bartov@gmail.com wrote:
Please review the DRAFT form. Do tell me what to add/change/remove. https://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?formkey=dHFGSEljVlBjUDlOdVZPWGV6TmR... Thanks!
Asaf
Asaf Bartov asaf.bartov@gmail.com
Movementroles mailing list Movementroles@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/movementroles
-- @notafish
NB. This gmail address is used for mailing lists. Personal emails will get lost. Intercultural musings: Ceci n'est pas une endive - http://blog.notanendive.org Photos with simple eyes: notaphoto - http://photo.notafish.org
sounds fair enough. Either solution would work, although a personal opinion box will most likely always be checked. I prefer not making it obligatory.
Lodewijk
2011/3/25 Delphine Ménard notafishz@gmail.com
Sorry for being so late on this...
I'm actually thinking that making the field "organisation" obligatory may keep some people from answering the survey, as they haven't had time to "talk" about this with their chapter and probably won't want to engage their chapter in this.
Possible ideas: *not make that field obligatory *add a "personal opinion" check box which allows people to give their personal opinion *make the name field obligatory and state that answers to this survey engage the respondant and noone else.
Whatcha think?
Delphine
2011/3/25 Delphine Ménard notafishz@gmail.com:
Asaf,
can you add that answers will be public?
I would really like to be able to put some of the thoughts on meta to feed the dsicussion.
Thanks,
Delphine
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 7:02 PM, Asaf Bartov asaf.bartov@gmail.com
wrote:
Please review the DRAFT form. Do tell me what to add/change/remove.
https://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?formkey=dHFGSEljVlBjUDlOdVZPWGV6TmR...
Thanks!
Asaf-- Asaf Bartov asaf.bartov@gmail.com
Movementroles mailing list Movementroles@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/movementroles
-- @notafish
NB. This gmail address is used for mailing lists. Personal emails will
get lost.
Intercultural musings: Ceci n'est pas une endive -
Photos with simple eyes: notaphoto - http://photo.notafish.org
-- @notafish
NB. This gmail address is used for mailing lists. Personal emails will get lost. Intercultural musings: Ceci n'est pas une endive - http://blog.notanendive.org Photos with simple eyes: notaphoto - http://photo.notafish.org
Movementroles mailing list Movementroles@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/movementroles
2011/3/25 Delphine Ménard notafishz@gmail.com:
I'm actually thinking that making the field "organisation" obligatory may keep some people from answering the survey, as they haven't had time to "talk" about this with their chapter and probably won't want to engage their chapter in this.
And, let's be fair, if they decline to give their name but do give their affilitation, with two representatives per chapter it's not very hard to narrow things down.
Austin
movementroles@lists.wikimedia.org