While I certainly agree in principle, do we know how many pages are relying on this feature? Also, some communication would be good.
On 14.01.2013, 22:21 Jon wrote:
I agree. We already have the nomobile class and have done so for a while. The noprint class has been removed from sometime and never got reevaluated with the addition of nomobile
Thanks for pointing this out!
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 6:42 PM, Danny B. Wikipedia.Danny.B@email.cz wrote:
Hello,
I found out, that items with class noprint are not delivered to the mobile version. Is that a bug or feature? If it is feature, then I strongly suggest to reconsider it and rather set up new class "nomobile" instead. Some stuff with noprint is useful on mobile, it just does not have a sense to *print* it.