While I certainly agree in principle, do we know how many pages are
relying on this feature? Also, some communication would be good.
On 14.01.2013, 22:21 Jon wrote:
We already have the nomobile class and have done so for a while. The
noprint class has been removed from sometime and never got reevaluated
with the addition of nomobile
Thanks for pointing this out!
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 6:42 PM, Danny B.
> I found out, that items with class noprint are not delivered to the mobile
> version. Is that a bug or feature? If it is feature, then I strongly suggest
> to reconsider it and rather set up new class "nomobile" instead. Some
> with noprint is useful on mobile, it just does not have a sense to *print*
Max Semenik ([[User:MaxSem]])