I agree.
We already have the nomobile class and have done so for a while. The
noprint class has been removed from sometime and never got reevaluated
with the addition of nomobile
Thanks for pointing this out!
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/43852
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 6:42 PM, Danny B. <Wikipedia.Danny.B(a)email.cz> wrote:
Hello,
I found out, that items with class noprint are not delivered to the mobile
version. Is that a bug or feature? If it is feature, then I strongly suggest
to reconsider it and rather set up new class "nomobile" instead. Some stuff
with noprint is useful on mobile, it just does not have a sense to *print*
it.
Kind regards
Danny B.
_______________________________________________
Mobile-l mailing list
Mobile-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l
--
Jon Robson
http://jonrobson.me.uk
@rakugojon