Yup, run one that you've discussed recently or are considering to see
if this rubric makes the conversation easier and keeps the team
aligned.
That's what it should be doing.
--tomasz
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Adam Baso <abaso(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
I don't think we have anything just yet, but maybe
we could try looking at
_one_ of the recently added libraries just as a proof of process? iOS crew,
any particular simple one we could try this on?
-Adam
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Tomasz Finc <tfinc(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
Good to see this drafted.
What's our first use case to vet our criteria ?
--tomasz
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Adam Baso <abaso(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
> Following up, here's where we arrived:
>
>
>
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Apps/Team/iOS/Third_Party_Libraries
>
> -Adam
>
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 9:37 AM, Adam Baso <abaso(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
>>
>> The apps crew is going to be having a meeting to go over third party
>> library usage in iOS. We're currently use CocoaPods for package
>> management.
>>
>> In advance of that meeting tomorrow, anybody have advice we should
>> consider?
>>
>> -Adam
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mobile-l mailing list
> Mobile-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l
>