Yup, run one that you've discussed recently or are considering to see if this rubric makes the conversation easier and keeps the team aligned.
That's what it should be doing.
--tomasz
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Adam Baso abaso@wikimedia.org wrote:
I don't think we have anything just yet, but maybe we could try looking at _one_ of the recently added libraries just as a proof of process? iOS crew, any particular simple one we could try this on?
-Adam
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Tomasz Finc tfinc@wikimedia.org wrote:
Good to see this drafted.
What's our first use case to vet our criteria ?
--tomasz
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Adam Baso abaso@wikimedia.org wrote:
Following up, here's where we arrived:
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Apps/Team/iOS/Third_Party_Libraries
-Adam
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 9:37 AM, Adam Baso abaso@wikimedia.org wrote:
The apps crew is going to be having a meeting to go over third party library usage in iOS. We're currently use CocoaPods for package management.
In advance of that meeting tomorrow, anybody have advice we should consider?
-Adam
Mobile-l mailing list Mobile-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l