And just to be clear -- everybody who has browsed the site but has not logged in (i.e. the vast majority of our readers) will be using Vector?
thanks for putting this together.
-Toby
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Gergo Tisza gtisza@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Adam Baso abaso@wikimedia.org wrote:
I think it was Joaquin, Sam, and Bryan with whom I discussed relative skins usage on some popular skins, in the context of which skins Reading is on the hook for in the sense of full maintenance or high priority fixes (even if only coordinating) when issues arise. Here's that data, based on some queries Timo ran recently (thanks, Timo!).
- en.wikipedia.org, users active since 2015-01-01, skin=cologneblue: 7k
users.
- en.wikipedia.org, users active since 2015-01-01, skin=monobook: 193k
users.
en.wikipedia.org, users active since 2015-01-01: 3.1m users.
en.wikipedia.org, users active since 2015-03-01, skin=cologneblue: 6k
users.
- en.wikipedia.org, users active since 2015-03-01, skin=monobook: 179k
users.
en.wikipedia.org, users active since 2015-03-01: 2.3m users.
commons.wikimedia.org, users active since 2015-03-01,
skin=cologneblue: 1k users.
- commons.wikimedia.org, users active since 2015-03-01, skin=monobook:
59k users.
- commons.wikimedia.org, users active since 2015-03-01: 687k users.
Expect the ratio of users with obscure configuration settings to sharply rise when you look at groups with higher activity. E.g. a year ago, when I looked up various stats for the MediaViewer launch, non-Vector usage was 5% for users who edited Wikipedia in the last 30 days, and 15% for those who made at least 100 edits in the last 30 days. Non-Monobook usage also grows (over a percent for very active editors).
Mobile-l mailing list Mobile-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l