On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Adam Baso
<abaso(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
I think it was Joaquin, Sam, and Bryan with whom
I discussed relative
skins usage on some popular skins, in the context of which skins Reading is
on the hook for in the sense of full maintenance or high priority fixes
(even if only coordinating) when issues arise. Here's that data, based on
some queries Timo ran recently (thanks, Timo!).
*
en.wikipedia.org, users active since 2015-01-01, skin=cologneblue: 7k
users.
*
en.wikipedia.org, users active since 2015-01-01, skin=monobook: 193k
users.
*
en.wikipedia.org, users active since 2015-01-01: 3.1m users.
*
en.wikipedia.org, users active since 2015-03-01, skin=cologneblue: 6k
users.
*
en.wikipedia.org, users active since 2015-03-01, skin=monobook: 179k
users.
*
en.wikipedia.org, users active since 2015-03-01: 2.3m users.
*
commons.wikimedia.org, users active since 2015-03-01,
skin=cologneblue: 1k users.
*
commons.wikimedia.org, users active since 2015-03-01, skin=monobook:
59k users.
*
commons.wikimedia.org, users active since 2015-03-01: 687k users.
Expect the ratio of users with obscure configuration settings to sharply
rise when you look at groups with higher activity. E.g. a year ago, when I
looked up various stats for the MediaViewer launch, non-Vector usage was 5%
for users who edited Wikipedia in the last 30 days, and 15% for those who
made at least 100 edits in the last 30 days. Non-Monobook usage also grows
(over a percent for very active editors).
_______________________________________________
Mobile-l mailing list
Mobile-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org