It would be good to get desktop and mobile in the same graph so we can
compare the two.
If I'm reading correctly this is all rather depressing - we are pretty
much the same as desktop despite being an environment which should
explicitly do better?
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 7:02 AM, Sam Smith <samsmith(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
Hey y'all,
As part of Mobile Web Sprint 45: Snakes on a Plane, the Readership team
picked up a spike to investigate what data, if any, we were logging around
site speed [0], given the existence of the mobile graphs over at WMF stats
[1].
After a little poking around I found that all of the NavigationTiming data
that's collected by the eponymous extension is already separated out into
desktop and mobile series in Graphite [2]. Any or all of these series can be
graphed in gdash by defining our own graphs [3].
With this in mind I've closed the tasks to design and implement our own
event logging for site speed as invalid – don't you just love it when work's
already done for you?
Furthermore, if we find, some time in the future, that we want do refine the
data that's being collected, then we have a clearly defined workflow: design
the schema with the help of analytics, instrument the schema, and then
define a graph. You'll note that only the first step requires collaboration
(i.e. synchronisation) with another team. Woo!
–Sam
[0]
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T95296
[1]
https://gdash.wikimedia.org/dashboards/frontend/
[2]
https://graphite.wikimedia.org – have a good look around frontend -
navtiming
[3]
https://github.com/wikimedia/operations-puppet/tree/production/files/gdash/…
_______________________________________________
Mobile-l mailing list
Mobile-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l