(This could also be an attack vector, though.
Imagine a local conflict resulting in list admin A marking person B's posts as spam on that local list, effectively silencing person B across all Wikimedia lists.
Without mitigation against that [e.g. a global review queue of marked spam before it becomes a global block], I would be wary of such a feature.)
A.
On Sat, 8 May 2021, 02:05 Kunal Mehta legoktm@debian.org wrote:
On 5/7/21 3:04 PM, effe iets anders wrote:
With the new mailman, I'm really excited to see global bans. Is there already some workflow we're supposed to follow to mark spam? It would be great if listadmins could mark stuff as spam and that would then trigger global bans somehow if it happened multiple times. I know I can file a ticket, but want to make sure we first arrive on a desirable solution before we throw it into the dev's lap(s) :)
Yeah, that would be really nice. In the past this has been proposed as "Allow list admins to train spam filters"[1] after GNOME patched their Mailman to do so.
Upstream mailman3 has a bug for this as well[2], where they suggest that a plugin could be written for this. If someone writes said plugin and it works, we can definitely deploy/enable it.
In the meantime I would suggest if you notice a new spam problem, post here, see if other list admins also say they're having similar problems, and then we sysadmins can take action.
[1] https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T244241 [2] https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman/-/issues/88
-- Kunal _______________________________________________ Listadmins mailing list -- listadmins@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe send an email to listadmins-leave@lists.wikimedia.org
By sending a message to this list, you email all admins of all lists. To request technical changes for a specific list, instead create a task in Phabricator. See https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists