Hoi,
For your information. When a language gets to the stage where it is
promoted to a full Wikipedia, the articles written in the Incubator will be
verified by a linguist who knows that language.
The question whether Wiki stuff is significant as a reference is not
relevant. What is relevant is that an expert opinion is sought to verify
that the language used is indeed the language in use. It would not be a
problem to ask the expert to look at the data provided to the CLDR.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 13 June 2014 22:42, Jukka K. Korpela <jkorpela(a)cs.tut.fi> wrote:
2014-06-13 22:57, Philippe Verdy wrote:
New localized Wikimedia projects have been approved for creation after
their test in Wikimedia Incubator:
Wiki* things as such are comparable to drawings on public toilet walls,
except that such drawings may carry the author’s name or signature.
My point is that Wiki* stuff as such is not significant as a reference. If
reliable references are cited on a Wiki* page, it is better to cite those
references directly.
Please remember that anyone can write anything at Wiki* and often will.
Yucca
_______________________________________________
CLDR-Users mailing list
CLDR-Users(a)unicode.org
http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/cldr-users