JSON is evil. I am already parsing it with another c#
application. It's
terrible, see yourlsef:
maybe it's good for java, I don't know, but it seems to me like a good
language for serialized data, not for configuration which is different in
every version
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 3:11 AM, Krinkle <krinklemail(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Yeah, I'd prefer JSON as well.
* Easier to read/edit
* Better support for different value types (arrays, booleans, strings,
numbers)
Or a simplified form of JSON, YAML, which also supports inline comments
(or strip comments from the JSON before parsing, like for .jshintrc in
JSHint).
-- Krinkle
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Platonides <platonides(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 22/01/13 15:08, Petr Bena wrote:
huggle_xml.css
It's quite odd to store a xml with a css extension, and the wiki doesn't
support good editing of xml either.
Why not use JSON, storing it on huggle.js?
_______________________________________________
Huggle mailing list
Huggle(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/huggle
_______________________________________________
Huggle mailing list
Huggle(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/huggle