JSON is evil. I am already parsing it with another c# application. It's terrible, see yourlsef: https://github.com/benapetr/wikimedia-bot/blob/master/plugins/labs/labs/labs/Class1.cs#L218

maybe it's good for java, I don't know, but it seems to me like a good language for serialized data, not for configuration which is different in every version

On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 3:11 AM, Krinkle <krinklemail@gmail.com> wrote:

Yeah, I'd prefer JSON as well.

* Easier to read/edit

* Better support for different value types (arrays, booleans, strings, numbers)

Or a simplified form of JSON, YAML, which also supports inline comments

(or strip comments from the JSON before parsing, like for .jshintrc in JSHint).

-- Krinkle

On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Platonides <platonides@gmail.com> wrote:

On 22/01/13 15:08, Petr Bena wrote:
> huggle_xml.css

It's quite odd to store a xml with a css extension, and the wiki doesn't
support good editing of xml either.

Why not use JSON, storing it on huggle.js?

_______________________________________________
Huggle mailing list
Huggle@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/huggle

_______________________________________________
Huggle mailing list
Huggle@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/huggle