Hi Brian,
Yes,
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T98734 was one of the requests;
others were
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T98744 and
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T98733
These all related to a two-day workshop session organised at the British
Library, at significant expense to the BL, to get to grips with GlamWiki
Toolset.
The aim on day 1 was to introduce the capabilities of the GWT, Commons,
categories etc; and then on day 2 to practically work through some
sample image sets.
It was a learning experience for us on the Wikimedia side as well, but
one of the very clear messages of the day is the whole set of processes
that need to be gone through before one can get started with the GWT
appear to be needlessly convoluted, obstructionist and time-wasting.
GWT is supposed to be the preferred path for GLAMs to upload their
content, with maximum metadata capture and reliability.
For a major GLAM like the British Library, it ought to be a complete
triviality for the head of their Labs group to get their main domain
whitelisted. (And actually, even for the smallest minor GLAM while
we're on the subject). The song-and-dance they got put through is
utterly pointless and self-defeating.
By the end of the second day of the workshop, their main domain
*.bl.uk had still not been whitelisted, because somebody took it
upon themselves to quibble about the quality of some of the images in a
test set.
The domain acms.sl.nsw.gov.au for a visiting participant from the
State Library of New South Wales was only cleared at 4pm in the
afternoon, as the workshop was closing -- after quibbling about the metadata
Luckily the domain
www.jacar.go.jp for some Japanese prints was
cleared in time, so there was at least one dataset that the tool could
actually be used on (rather than what should have been five). Even that
was only because some passing admin had over-ruled an initial quibble.
Apparently:
* getting a domain approved requires the main system config file to be
changed.
* this can only take effect at 4pm or midnight BST
* requests will only be considered on San Francisco time
* any request will get at least one gratuitous knock back.
This is simply not good enough. When the whole of Flickr is wide-open
for use by the GW upload tool, this obstructionism is absurd.
We had five very experienced Commons users in the room today, all of
them in good standing with thousands of uploads to their name, and none
of them could do anything to move the process forward.
This ought to be reviewed urgently, and the GWT whitelist should be
divorced from the central system config files as soon as possible, and
instead be placed somewhere where any admin can update it with immediate
effect, without any of the runaround on Phabricator, which for the GLAM
people trying to learn how to do things for themselves at the workshop
yesterday and today was an utterly confusing and unnecessary extra
complexity.
And the next time somebody asks for content upload to be made possible
from one of the great libraries in the world, please everyone let's not
waste people's time with petty quibbling.
-- James.
On 12/05/2015 20:06, Brian Wolff wrote:
On May 12, 2015 6:36 AM, "Ally Crockford"
<a.n.crockford(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi all
Training is progressing well here at the BL, and there are several
curators with
XML files who would like to test uploads on Beta but are
still waiting to have the requested domains whitelisted.
The requests have been logged on Phabricator - I was wondering if there's
anyone on the list and currently awake/available to approve the
whitelisting?
Cheers,
Ally
----
Dr Ally Crockford
E-mail: A.Crockford(a)ed.ac.uk
Departmental Profile
Would that be
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T98734 ? There was a
comment by Dereckson that nobody has responded to.
--bawolff
_______________________________________________
Glamtools mailing list
Glamtools(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glamtools