Glamtools December 2015

glamtools@lists.wikimedia.org

11 participants
6 discussions

Overwriting possible if file not edited by other users Re: Same user? Re: Yes Re: Batch re-uploading images to Commons in higher resolution?

by Hans Muller

@Arne and experts: We can overwrite a file with GWToolset provided no other user has edited the file. Perhaps experts are aware of further options with GWT for overwriting files. Examples: 1. GWToolset overwriting with a different resolution succeeded for https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Naturalis_Biodiversity_Center_-_RMN… checking the box "Reload media from URL" down the page. The new resolution is considered a new version. (Here a downgrade as a test.) The old version remains available. 2. GWToolset overwriting failed for https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Naturalis_Biodiversity_Center_- >> _RMNH.MOL.216649_-_Mitra_aurantia_aurantia_%28Gmelin,_1791%29_-_Mitrida >> e_-_Mollusc_shell.jpeg with or without that box checked because "A media file with the identical title "File:Naturalis Biodiversity Center - RMNH.MOL.216649 - Mitra aurantia aurantia (Gmelin, 1791) - Mitridae - Mollusc shell.jpeg" already exists in the wiki. It was edited or created by someone other than you" - another user had edited the categories. Best regards, hans muller https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Hansmuller Op Do, 17 december, 2015 12:39 pm schreef Arne Wossink: > @Hans, > > > Thanks for the input so far. Please keep me updated on that overwrite. If > anything, it is once again a reminder that these things must be done > right the first time around ;) > > Best, > > > > Arne Wossink > > > Projectleider / Project Lead Wikimedia Nederland > > > Tel. +31 (0)6 11000505 > (di, wo, do) > > > *Postadres*: * > Bezoekadres:* > Postbus 167 Mariaplaats 3 > 3500 AD Utrecht Utrecht > > > 2015-12-17 12:34 GMT+01:00 Hans Muller <j.m.muller(a)hccnet.nl>: > > >> We're talking about >> >> >> >> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Media_contributed_by_Museum >> _Catharijneconvent >> >> >> ? Main uploader there was HuskyBot i think. >> >> >> I made a mistake some months a go while uploading photographs of dead >> bird skins for Naturalis with GWToolset with various views for the same >> specimen uploaded under the same filename. So that is like uploading a >> higher resolution, an image with a different checksum under the same >> name. You see the result here: >> >> >> >> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Naturalis_Biodiversity_Center_- >> _RMNH.AVES.101712_-_Corvus_enca_compilator_Richmond,_1903_-_Corvidae_-_ >> bird_skin_specimen.jpeg >> >> (scroll down) >> Later uploads under the same filename by GWToolset were accepted as new >> versions. Caveat: the uploader was the same user for these various >> "versions". >> >> >> Best regards, hansmuller >> >> >> PS At the end of my present batch (18/12 morning?) GWToolset is >> requested to overwrite medium resolution >> >> >> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Naturalis_Biodiversity_Center_- >> _RMNH.MOL.216649_-_Mitra_aurantia_aurantia_%28Gmelin,_1791%29_-_Mitrida >> e_-_Mollusc_shell.jpeg >> >> with large, so we'll see. I can put up a test image to test if another >> GWToolset user can overwrite >> it (?). I don't think so, this might be Arnes problem. >> >> >> >> >> Op Do, 17 december, 2015 11:30 am schreef Jesse de Vos: >> >>> Hi Arne, >>> I actually don't think this can be done. It is an action in which an >>> existing file on Commons must be updated, this is not supported by the >>> toolset. We had a similar issue with higher res. Video files. We >>> decided to stick with the current resolution. Alternatively, a >>> volunteer could do this update using a script. Best, Jesse >>> >>> >>> >>> verzonden vanaf mijn smartphone|sent from my smart phone Op 17 dec. >>> 2015 >>> 11:03 schreef "Hans Muller" <j.m.muller(a)hccnet.nl>: >>> >>> >>> >>>> Dear Arne, >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Yes, this is a modest batch that can be done with the GW toolset, >>>> most easily if the images each have a (temporary) individual URL and >>>> so are accessible on the internet. >>>> >>>> Groeten, hans muller >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Op Do, 17 december, 2015 10:57 am schreef Arne Wossink: >>>> >>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Museum Catharijneconvent has approached us that they would like >>>>> to make higher-resolution versions available of images that are >>>>> already available on Commons. Around 800-1500 images are involved. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Is this something that can be handled by the GW toolset, or are >>>>> there better ways to do this? >>>>> >>>>> Best, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Arne Wossink >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Projectleider / Project Lead Wikimedia Nederland >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Tel. +31 (0)6 11000505 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *Postadres*: * >>>>> Bezoekadres:* >>>>> Postbus 167 >>>>> Mariaplaats >>>>> 3 >>>>> 3500 AD Utrecht Utrecht >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Glamtools mailing list >>>>> Glamtools(a)lists.wikimedia.org >>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glamtools >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Glamtools mailing list >>>> Glamtools(a)lists.wikimedia.org >>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glamtools >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Glamtools mailing list >>> Glamtools(a)lists.wikimedia.org >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glamtools >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Glamtools mailing list >> Glamtools(a)lists.wikimedia.org >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glamtools >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Glamtools mailing list > Glamtools(a)lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glamtools > >

8 years, 4 months

Batch re-uploading images to Commons in higher resolution?

by Arne Wossink

Hi all, Museum Catharijneconvent has approached us that they would like to make higher-resolution versions available of images that are already available on Commons. Around 800-1500 images are involved. Is this something that can be handled by the GW toolset, or are there better ways to do this? Best, Arne Wossink Projectleider / Project Lead Wikimedia Nederland Tel. +31 (0)6 11000505 *Postadres*: * Bezoekadres:* Postbus 167 Mariaplaats 3 3500 AD Utrecht Utrecht

8 years, 4 months

Request GWToolset userrights on Beta

by Jens Best

Hi, I'm request GWToolset userrights on Beta to pratice. User:Jensbest

8 years, 4 months

Beta GWToolset request

by Martin Poulter

Hi all. In accordance with the instructions at https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Extension:GWToolset#Username_.26_user_r… , I'd like to be given the Beta GWToolset user rights so as to carry out testing of bulk imports from the Digital Bodleian as part of my residency at the Bodleian Libraries. My unified login for the Wikimedia projects is MartinPoulter. The images each have a permanent URL which redirects to a server where they are currently located, so the two domains I'd like whitelisted are http://iiif.bodleian.ox.ac.uk<http://iiif.bodleian.ox.ac.uk/iiif/image/4a53ccf2-53c2-46d1-98a2-cd6f679e9c…> and http://digital.bodleian.ox.ac.uk/ An example query: http://iiif.bodleian.ox.ac.uk/iiif/image/4a53ccf2-53c2-46d1-98a2-cd6f679e9c… is a permanent URL which links to http://digital.bodleian.ox.ac.uk/fcgi-bin/iipsrv.fcgi?IIIF=/silos/digital.b… Thanks in advance for any help,

8 years, 4 months

Learning Pattern Data transfers to Wikimedia Commons: Sharing institutional archives

by Nicolas Rück

We published a learning pattern in english and german with a focus on the GWToolset. Share it if you think it's useful: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:Learning_patterns/Data_transfers_to_… Regards Nico -- Nicolas Rück Ideenförderung Wikimedia Deutschland e.V. | Tempelhofer Ufer 23-24 | 10963 Berlin Tel. (030) 219 158 26-0 http://wikimedia.de Stellen Sie sich eine Welt vor, in der jeder Mensch an der Menge allen Wissens frei teilhaben kann. Helfen Sie uns dabei! http://spenden.wikimedia.de/ Wikimedia Deutschland - Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e. V. Eingetragen im Vereinsregister des Amtsgerichts Berlin-Charlottenburg unter der Nummer 23855 B. Als gemeinnützig anerkannt durch das Finanzamt für Körperschaften I Berlin, Steuernummer 27/681/51985.

8 years, 4 months

Update on the status of tiff rendering bugs (Was TIFF error when using Bulk Uploader)

by Brian Wolff

So about a week ago, there was a thread about tiff files not working as well as they should. Here's a status update: The good news: The 16-bit greyscale tiff files not rendering bug (T116947) is now fixed and the fix is live on commons. This affected a lot of images from the library of congress. Previously they showed up as either all black, or mostly white with a couple black lines. Now they work. The more meh news: We've identified a fix for the issue where pages after the first page of a large tiff do not render (T117349). This is a good step forward, but the fix is currently stuck pending review and I'm not sure what time frame the fix will be reviewed in. Tiff (and djvu) files on the beta cluster do not render (T116816). The people who maintain the beta cluster have put it on their list of next things to do. So hopefully it will be fixed soon. In the mean time, if you really need to see what a tiff would look like uploaded but don't want to put it in real commons, you can use test.wikipedia.org (but alas, gwtoolset does not work in that domain) -- -bawolff p.s. Fun fact that might interest the Basel University Library folks - If you order all the tiffs on commons by file size, 18 of the top 20 are from Basel University Library.

8 years, 4 months

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

Glamtools December 2015