Hi, these days I'm polishing the presence of the Wikimedia Foundation at http://ohloh.net in order to help promoting all the cool open suce projects we are developing.
The Analytics team has a nice section in Gerrit including many projects (see below). How would you prefer to have this reflected in Ohloh?
a) All repos under a generic Wikimedia Analytics project.
b) A few remarkable projects on its own (e.g. reportcard, gerrit-stats...) and the rest under a common umbrella.
c) Each repo has its own project.
Option A is easier to implement but offers less level of detail. Option C might add too much fragmentation if there are many tiny and not so relevant projects. I can go for the option you prefer.
Also let me know if there are repos not worth of listing in Ohloh e.g. internal stuff, playgrounds, data only repos interesting only for WMF dudes...
Thank you!
-- Quim
Sorry, forgot the list of projects at Gerrit, pasted now below for convenience.
On 10/22/2012 02:39 PM, Quim Gil wrote:
Hi, these days I'm polishing the presence of the Wikimedia Foundation at http://ohloh.net in order to help promoting all the cool open suce projects we are developing.
The Analytics team has a nice section in Gerrit including many projects (see below). How would you prefer to have this reflected in Ohloh?
a) All repos under a generic Wikimedia Analytics project.
b) A few remarkable projects on its own (e.g. reportcard, gerrit-stats...) and the rest under a common umbrella.
c) Each repo has its own project.
Option A is easier to implement but offers less level of detail. Option C might add too much fragmentation if there are many tiny and not so relevant projects. I can go for the option you prefer.
Also let me know if there are repos not worth of listing in Ohloh e.g. internal stuff, playgrounds, data only repos interesting only for WMF dudes...
Thank you!
analytics All WMF Analytics projects. analytics/DeviceMapLogCapture Repo for Apache DeviceMap project to collect data on mobile device capabilities. analytics/E3Analysis analytics/asana-stats Automatically generate status updates for email and wikis from Asana. analytics/check-stats analytics/editor-geocoding Geocoding of editors for Global Dev. analytics/gerrit-stats Collecting code review metrics analytics/gerrit-stats/data Gerrit stats data for Wikimedia repositories. analytics/glass analytics/global-dev/dashboard analytics/global-dev/dashboard-data analytics/global-dev/misc analytics/global-dev/reportcard analytics/global-dev/sqproc analytics/graphkit IGNORE THIS REPO analytics/libanon libanon - library of reusable anonymization functions. analytics/packages/thrift This repository has been abandoned in favor of https://github.com/wmf-analytics/thrift-debian analytics/reportcard The Reportcard website, built using the Limn framework. analytics/reportcard/data Repo containing all reportcard datasets. analytics/reportcard/old-pipeline Old data processing pipeline tools. Inactive. analytics/tools/kripke Tools, configuration, and other miscellany belonging to kripke. analytics/udp-filters The repository for the UDP log filters that are running on locke, emery, and oxygen. analytics/udplog udp2log and custom filters. udp2log listens for udp traffic and sends any received text to file or pipe child processes for additional processing. analytics/webstatscollector Source code for hourly collected pageviews that are published at dumps.wikimedia.org/other/pageviews/ analytics/wikistats Source code for wikistats.wikimedia.org
Hi Quim!
Probably b), with these as 'remarkable':
analytics/gerrit-stats analytics/udp-filters analytics/udplog
Also, there are these on Github:
https://github.com/wikimedia/limn https://github.com/wmf-analytics/puppet-cdh4
On Oct 22, 2012, at 5:39 PM, Quim Gil quimgil@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, these days I'm polishing the presence of the Wikimedia Foundation at http://ohloh.net in order to help promoting all the cool open suce projects we are developing.
The Analytics team has a nice section in Gerrit including many projects (see below). How would you prefer to have this reflected in Ohloh?
a) All repos under a generic Wikimedia Analytics project.
b) A few remarkable projects on its own (e.g. reportcard, gerrit-stats...) and the rest under a common umbrella.
c) Each repo has its own project.
Option A is easier to implement but offers less level of detail. Option C might add too much fragmentation if there are many tiny and not so relevant projects. I can go for the option you prefer.
Also let me know if there are repos not worth of listing in Ohloh e.g. internal stuff, playgrounds, data only repos interesting only for WMF dudes...
Thank you!
-- Quim
Analytics mailing list Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
Hi Quim,
There are a few things worth mentioning about the repos I am responsible for:
these repos should be deleted, or at least not publicized:
analytics/global-dev/reportcard analytics/global-dev/misc
this repo is hosted on gerrit and github, but they are not yet synced and the github version is the most up to date:
main: https://github.com/embr/sqproc out of date mirror: analytics/global-dev/sqproc
I also have a variety of github projects which are not tracked on gerrit but are analytics-y, though i don't think any of them would qualify as remarkable:
https://github.com/embr/limnpy https://github.com/embr/userstats https://github.com/embr/gcat
evan
On 10/22/12, Andrew Otto otto@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hi Quim!
Probably b), with these as 'remarkable':
analytics/gerrit-stats analytics/udp-filters analytics/udplog
Also, there are these on Github:
https://github.com/wikimedia/limn https://github.com/wmf-analytics/puppet-cdh4
On Oct 22, 2012, at 5:39 PM, Quim Gil quimgil@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, these days I'm polishing the presence of the Wikimedia Foundation at http://ohloh.net in order to help promoting all the cool open suce projects we are developing.
The Analytics team has a nice section in Gerrit including many projects (see below). How would you prefer to have this reflected in Ohloh?
a) All repos under a generic Wikimedia Analytics project.
b) A few remarkable projects on its own (e.g. reportcard, gerrit-stats...) and the rest under a common umbrella.
c) Each repo has its own project.
Option A is easier to implement but offers less level of detail. Option C might add too much fragmentation if there are many tiny and not so relevant projects. I can go for the option you prefer.
Also let me know if there are repos not worth of listing in Ohloh e.g. internal stuff, playgrounds, data only repos interesting only for WMF dudes...
Thank you!
-- Quim
Analytics mailing list Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
Analytics mailing list Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
I vote b) and I'm only responsible for one repo right now, which I hope will become increasingly remarkable :)
https://github.com/milimetric/limn
But that's just a fork of /wikimedia/limn. How are we handling forks?
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 6:02 PM, evan rosen erosen@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hi Quim,
There are a few things worth mentioning about the repos I am responsible for:
these repos should be deleted, or at least not publicized:
analytics/global-dev/reportcard analytics/global-dev/misc
this repo is hosted on gerrit and github, but they are not yet synced and the github version is the most up to date:
main: https://github.com/embr/sqproc out of date mirror: analytics/global-dev/sqproc
I also have a variety of github projects which are not tracked on gerrit but are analytics-y, though i don't think any of them would qualify as remarkable:
https://github.com/embr/limnpy https://github.com/embr/userstats https://github.com/embr/gcat
evan
On 10/22/12, Andrew Otto otto@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hi Quim!
Probably b), with these as 'remarkable':
analytics/gerrit-stats analytics/udp-filters analytics/udplog
Also, there are these on Github:
https://github.com/wikimedia/limn https://github.com/wmf-analytics/puppet-cdh4
On Oct 22, 2012, at 5:39 PM, Quim Gil quimgil@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, these days I'm polishing the presence of the Wikimedia Foundation at http://ohloh.net in order to help promoting all the cool open suce projects we are developing.
The Analytics team has a nice section in Gerrit including many projects (see below). How would you prefer to have this reflected in Ohloh?
a) All repos under a generic Wikimedia Analytics project.
b) A few remarkable projects on its own (e.g. reportcard,
gerrit-stats...)
and the rest under a common umbrella.
c) Each repo has its own project.
Option A is easier to implement but offers less level of detail. Option
C
might add too much fragmentation if there are many tiny and not so relevant projects. I can go for the option you prefer.
Also let me know if there are repos not worth of listing in Ohloh e.g. internal stuff, playgrounds, data only repos interesting only for WMF dudes...
Thank you!
-- Quim
Analytics mailing list Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
Analytics mailing list Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
Analytics mailing list Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
We should be tracking the canonical repository for the purposes of the Official Project, and that's https://github.com/wikimedia/limn -- you'll be merging all your changes into there, after all, yes?
Ok, hopefully all the requests are fulfilled (the good news is that you can add / delete / edit yourselves anything you dislike). :)
Wikimedia Analytics umbrella https://www.ohloh.net/p/wmf-analytics
Provides very nice stats about your work! Should contain all the top & mildly relevant repos. I have only omitted projects that seemed basically empty, inactive or filled with data only. Please check https://www.ohloh.net/p/wmf-analytics/enlistments and amend if needed.
On 10/22/2012 02:47 PM, Andrew Otto wrote:
analytics/gerrit-stats
https://www.ohloh.net/p/gerrit-stats
The /data repo hasn't been added.
analytics/udp-filters analytics/udplog
I took the liberty to merge them under
https://www.ohloh.net/p/wmf-udp
You can split in two projects if you prefer.
Also, there are these on Github:
https://www.ohloh.net/p/puppet-cdh4
Note that https://www.ohloh.net/p/wikimedia-puppet also exists. Do they overlap, should they merge...?
On 10/22/2012 03:02 PM, evan rosen wrote:> Hi Quim,
these repos should be deleted, or at least not publicized:
analytics/global-dev/reportcard analytics/global-dev/misc
They haven't been added to Ohloh.
this repo is hosted on gerrit and github, but they are not yet synced and the github version is the most up to date:
main: https://github.com/embr/sqproc out of date mirror: analytics/global-dev/sqproc
https://www.ohloh.net/p/sqproc
I also have a variety of github projects which are not tracked on gerrit but are analytics-y, though i don't think any of them would qualify as remarkable:
Added to https://www.ohloh.net/p/limn
https://github.com/embr/userstats https://github.com/embr/gcat
Added to https://www.ohloh.net/p/wmf-analytics
On 10/22/2012 08:55 PM, Dan Andreescu wrote:
I vote b) and I'm only responsible for one repo right now, which I hope will become increasingly remarkable :)
https://github.com/milimetric/limn
But that's just a fork of /wikimedia/limn. How are we handling forks?
For this Ohloh exercise I have enough dealing with the mess of canonical repos spread through gerrit.wikimedia.org and GitHub. :) You can decide whether you want to add or ignore that fork. Bare in mind though that we are using Ohloh for the purpose of gathering stats and recruiting new contributors. In that sense a fork doesn't add much.
-- Quim
@dschoon yes. Evan linked to his repos so I got confused.
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Quim Gil quimgil@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, hopefully all the requests are fulfilled (the good news is that you can add / delete / edit yourselves anything you dislike). :)
Wikimedia Analytics umbrella https://www.ohloh.net/p/wmf-**analyticshttps://www.ohloh.net/p/wmf-analytics
Provides very nice stats about your work! Should contain all the top & mildly relevant repos. I have only omitted projects that seemed basically empty, inactive or filled with data only. Please check https://www.ohloh.net/p/wmf-**analytics/enlistmentshttps://www.ohloh.net/p/wmf-analytics/enlistmentsand amend if needed.
On 10/22/2012 02:47 PM, Andrew Otto wrote:
analytics/gerrit-stats
https://www.ohloh.net/p/**gerrit-statshttps://www.ohloh.net/p/gerrit-stats
The /data repo hasn't been added.
analytics/udp-filters analytics/udplog
I took the liberty to merge them under
https://www.ohloh.net/p/wmf-**udp https://www.ohloh.net/p/wmf-udp
You can split in two projects if you prefer.
Also, there are these on Github:
https://github.com/wikimedia/**limn https://github.com/wikimedia/limn
https://github.com/wmf-**analytics/puppet-cdh4https://github.com/wmf-analytics/puppet-cdh4
https://www.ohloh.net/p/**puppet-cdh4https://www.ohloh.net/p/puppet-cdh4
Note that https://www.ohloh.net/p/**wikimedia-puppethttps://www.ohloh.net/p/wikimedia-puppetalso exists. Do they overlap, should they merge...?
On 10/22/2012 03:02 PM, evan rosen wrote:> Hi Quim,
these repos should be deleted, or at least not publicized:
analytics/global-dev/**reportcard analytics/global-dev/misc
They haven't been added to Ohloh.
this repo is hosted on gerrit and github, but they are not yet synced and the github version is the most up to date:
main: https://github.com/embr/sqproc out of date mirror: analytics/global-dev/sqproc
https://www.ohloh.net/p/sqproc
I also have a variety of github projects which are not tracked on gerrit but are analytics-y, though i don't think any of them would qualify as remarkable:
Added to https://www.ohloh.net/p/limn
https://github.com/embr/**userstatshttps://github.com/embr/userstats https://github.com/embr/gcat
Added to https://www.ohloh.net/p/wmf-**analyticshttps://www.ohloh.net/p/wmf-analytics
On 10/22/2012 08:55 PM, Dan Andreescu wrote:
I vote b) and I'm only responsible for one repo right now, which I hope will become increasingly remarkable :)
https://github.com/milimetric/**limnhttps://github.com/milimetric/limn
But that's just a fork of /wikimedia/limn. How are we handling forks?
For this Ohloh exercise I have enough dealing with the mess of canonical repos spread through gerrit.wikimedia.org and GitHub. :) You can decide whether you want to add or ignore that fork. Bare in mind though that we are using Ohloh for the purpose of gathering stats and recruiting new contributors. In that sense a fork doesn't add much.
-- Quim
______________________________**_________________ Analytics mailing list Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/**mailman/listinfo/analyticshttps://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
Thank you Quim, this is pretty cool. Extra incentive for that big upcoming merge :)
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Quim Gil quimgil@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, hopefully all the requests are fulfilled (the good news is that you can add / delete / edit yourselves anything you dislike). :)
Wikimedia Analytics umbrella https://www.ohloh.net/p/wmf-**analyticshttps://www.ohloh.net/p/wmf-analytics
Provides very nice stats about your work! Should contain all the top & mildly relevant repos. I have only omitted projects that seemed basically empty, inactive or filled with data only. Please check https://www.ohloh.net/p/wmf-**analytics/enlistmentshttps://www.ohloh.net/p/wmf-analytics/enlistmentsand amend if needed.
On 10/22/2012 02:47 PM, Andrew Otto wrote:
analytics/gerrit-stats
https://www.ohloh.net/p/**gerrit-statshttps://www.ohloh.net/p/gerrit-stats
The /data repo hasn't been added.
analytics/udp-filters analytics/udplog
I took the liberty to merge them under
https://www.ohloh.net/p/wmf-**udp https://www.ohloh.net/p/wmf-udp
You can split in two projects if you prefer.
Also, there are these on Github:
https://github.com/wikimedia/**limn https://github.com/wikimedia/limn
https://github.com/wmf-**analytics/puppet-cdh4https://github.com/wmf-analytics/puppet-cdh4
https://www.ohloh.net/p/**puppet-cdh4https://www.ohloh.net/p/puppet-cdh4
Note that https://www.ohloh.net/p/**wikimedia-puppethttps://www.ohloh.net/p/wikimedia-puppetalso exists. Do they overlap, should they merge...?
On 10/22/2012 03:02 PM, evan rosen wrote:> Hi Quim,
these repos should be deleted, or at least not publicized:
analytics/global-dev/**reportcard analytics/global-dev/misc
They haven't been added to Ohloh.
this repo is hosted on gerrit and github, but they are not yet synced and the github version is the most up to date:
main: https://github.com/embr/sqproc out of date mirror: analytics/global-dev/sqproc
https://www.ohloh.net/p/sqproc
I also have a variety of github projects which are not tracked on gerrit but are analytics-y, though i don't think any of them would qualify as remarkable:
Added to https://www.ohloh.net/p/limn
https://github.com/embr/**userstatshttps://github.com/embr/userstats https://github.com/embr/gcat
Added to https://www.ohloh.net/p/wmf-**analyticshttps://www.ohloh.net/p/wmf-analytics
On 10/22/2012 08:55 PM, Dan Andreescu wrote:
I vote b) and I'm only responsible for one repo right now, which I hope will become increasingly remarkable :)
https://github.com/milimetric/**limnhttps://github.com/milimetric/limn
But that's just a fork of /wikimedia/limn. How are we handling forks?
For this Ohloh exercise I have enough dealing with the mess of canonical repos spread through gerrit.wikimedia.org and GitHub. :) You can decide whether you want to add or ignore that fork. Bare in mind though that we are using Ohloh for the purpose of gathering stats and recruiting new contributors. In that sense a fork doesn't add much.
-- Quim
______________________________**_________________ Analytics mailing list Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/**mailman/listinfo/analyticshttps://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
I don't understand, is this only about analytics? MediaWiki information on Ohloh would use a lot of love and requests to the site administrators for duplicates removal etc. just sit forever.
Nemo
On 10/23/2012 11:43 AM, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote:
I don't understand, is this only about analytics? MediaWiki information on Ohloh would use a lot of love and requests to the site administrators for duplicates removal etc. just sit forever.
Sorry, I should have provided the context of this thread:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2012-October/063879.html
Ohloh is about to release statistics by organization and I'm volunteering putting together all the relevant Wikimedia projects.
The discussion here has been limited to Analytics just because this is the topic of the list. If you have more generic feedback (or specific but in areas other than Analytics) you can use the wikitech-l thread or just reply to my email.
Thank you!
-- Quim