On 10/22/12, Andrew Otto <
otto@wikimedia.org> wrote:
> Hi Quim!
>
> Probably b), with these as 'remarkable':
>
> analytics/gerrit-stats
> analytics/udp-filters
> analytics/udplog
>
> Also, there are these on Github:
>
>
https://github.com/wikimedia/limn
>
https://github.com/wmf-analytics/puppet-cdh4
>
>
>
> On Oct 22, 2012, at 5:39 PM, Quim Gil <
quimgil@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi, these days I'm polishing the presence of the Wikimedia Foundation at
>>
http://ohloh.net in order to help promoting all the cool open suce
>> projects we are developing.
>>
>> The Analytics team has a nice section in Gerrit including many projects
>> (see below). How would you prefer to have this reflected in Ohloh?
>>
>> a) All repos under a generic Wikimedia Analytics project.
>>
>> b) A few remarkable projects on its own (e.g. reportcard, gerrit-stats...)
>> and the rest under a common umbrella.
>>
>> c) Each repo has its own project.
>>
>> Option A is easier to implement but offers less level of detail. Option C
>> might add too much fragmentation if there are many tiny and not so
>> relevant projects. I can go for the option you prefer.
>>
>> Also let me know if there are repos not worth of listing in Ohloh e.g.
>> internal stuff, playgrounds, data only repos interesting only for WMF
>> dudes...
>>
>> Thank you!
>>
>> --
>> Quim
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Analytics mailing list
>>
Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org
>>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Analytics mailing list
>
Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org
>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
>
_______________________________________________
Analytics mailing list
Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics