I vote b) and I'm only responsible for one repo right now, which I hope will become increasingly remarkable :)

But that's just a fork of /wikimedia/limn. How are we handling forks?

On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 6:02 PM, evan rosen <erosen@wikimedia.org> wrote:

Hi Quim,

There are a few things worth mentioning about the repos I am responsible for:

these repos should be deleted, or at least not publicized:

analytics/global-dev/reportcard
analytics/global-dev/misc

this repo is hosted on gerrit and github, but they are not yet synced
and the github version is the most up to date:

main:
https://github.com/embr/sqproc
out of date mirror:
analytics/global-dev/sqproc

I also have a variety of github projects which are not tracked on
gerrit but are analytics-y, though i don't think any of them would
qualify as remarkable:

https://github.com/embr/limnpy
https://github.com/embr/userstats
https://github.com/embr/gcat

evan

On 10/22/12, Andrew Otto <otto@wikimedia.org> wrote:
> Hi Quim!
>
> Probably b), with these as 'remarkable':
>
> analytics/gerrit-stats
> analytics/udp-filters
> analytics/udplog
>
> Also, there are these on Github:
>
> https://github.com/wikimedia/limn
> https://github.com/wmf-analytics/puppet-cdh4
>
>
>
> On Oct 22, 2012, at 5:39 PM, Quim Gil <quimgil@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi, these days I'm polishing the presence of the Wikimedia Foundation at
>> http://ohloh.net in order to help promoting all the cool open suce
>> projects we are developing.
>>
>> The Analytics team has a nice section in Gerrit including many projects
>> (see below). How would you prefer to have this reflected in Ohloh?
>>
>> a) All repos under a generic Wikimedia Analytics project.
>>
>> b) A few remarkable projects on its own (e.g. reportcard, gerrit-stats...)
>> and the rest under a common umbrella.
>>
>> c) Each repo has its own project.
>>
>> Option A is easier to implement but offers less level of detail. Option C
>> might add too much fragmentation if there are many tiny and not so
>> relevant projects. I can go for the option you prefer.
>>
>> Also let me know if there are repos not worth of listing in Ohloh e.g.
>> internal stuff, playgrounds, data only repos interesting only for WMF
>> dudes...
>>
>> Thank you!
>>
>> --
>> Quim
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Analytics mailing list
>> Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Analytics mailing list
> Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
>

_______________________________________________
Analytics mailing list
Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics

_______________________________________________

Analytics mailing list

Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org

https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics