Oof, only that it is ugly! :)
Can you just call it ‘provenance', or are you trying to be more future proof?
On Mar 4, 2015, at 12:11, Adam Baso
<abaso(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
I pinged on Phabricator at
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T90606
<https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T90606> about modeling after that patch. That
sort of approach should avoid cache fragmentation.
As for parameter name, 'wmfxan' is short and I think would avoid collisions. Any
problems with this parameter name?
-Adam
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 8:27 AM, Nuria Ruiz <nuria(a)wikimedia.org
<mailto:nuria@wikimedia.org>> wrote:
Ping ... (regarding cache question)
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Gergo Tisza <gtisza(a)wikimedia.org
<mailto:gtisza@wikimedia.org>> wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Nuria Ruiz <nuria(a)wikimedia.org
<mailto:nuria@wikimedia.org>> wrote:
2. What about caching?
Is this page:
http://wikipedia.org/BarackObama?some_param=some-value
<http://wikipedia.org/BarackObama?some_param=some-value> being served from the cache
as it should be?
The file download parameter was handled via this patch:
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/120617/
<https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/120617/>
Seems like an analogous scenario.
_______________________________________________
Analytics mailing list
Analytics(a)lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
<https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics>
_______________________________________________
Analytics mailing list
Analytics(a)lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
<https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics>