Oof, only that it is ugly! :)

Can you just call it ‘provenance', or are you trying to be more future proof?





On Mar 4, 2015, at 12:11, Adam Baso <abaso@wikimedia.org> wrote:

I pinged on Phabricator at https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T90606 about modeling after that patch. That sort of approach should avoid cache fragmentation.

As for parameter name, 'wmfxan' is short and I think would avoid collisions. Any problems with this parameter name?

-Adam


On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 8:27 AM, Nuria Ruiz <nuria@wikimedia.org> wrote:
Ping ... (regarding cache question)

On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Gergo Tisza <gtisza@wikimedia.org> wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Nuria Ruiz <nuria@wikimedia.org> wrote:
2. What about caching? 
Is this page: http://wikipedia.org/BarackObama?some_param=some-value being served from the cache as it should be?

The file download parameter was handled via this patch: https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/120617/ 
Seems like an analogous scenario.

_______________________________________________
Analytics mailing list
Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics



_______________________________________________
Analytics mailing list
Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics