Oof, only that it is ugly! :)
Can you just call it ‘provenance', or are you trying to be more future proof?
On Mar 4, 2015, at 12:11, Adam Baso abaso@wikimedia.org wrote:
I pinged on Phabricator at https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T90606 https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T90606 about modeling after that patch. That sort of approach should avoid cache fragmentation.
As for parameter name, 'wmfxan' is short and I think would avoid collisions. Any problems with this parameter name?
-Adam
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 8:27 AM, Nuria Ruiz <nuria@wikimedia.org mailto:nuria@wikimedia.org> wrote: Ping ... (regarding cache question)
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Gergo Tisza <gtisza@wikimedia.org mailto:gtisza@wikimedia.org> wrote: On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Nuria Ruiz <nuria@wikimedia.org mailto:nuria@wikimedia.org> wrote: 2. What about caching? Is this page: http://wikipedia.org/BarackObama?some_param=some-value http://wikipedia.org/BarackObama?some_param=some-value being served from the cache as it should be?
The file download parameter was handled via this patch: https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/120617/ https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/120617/ Seems like an analogous scenario.
Analytics mailing list Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org mailto:Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
Analytics mailing list Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org mailto:Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics