So the pageview definition, one of our core organisational KPIs, is
owned simultaneously by everyone?
On 3 December 2015 at 12:54, Nuria Ruiz <nuria(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
>Who does own it?
On our opinion every team should own the definition of a pageview in
their
product right and when in doubt analytics or research can be involved to
provide feedback on lessons learned.
For example: who is best qualified than IOS team to decide what
constitutes
a page in the IOS app?
With that in mind I have created a ticket to define what constitutes a
Search pageview:
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T120249
Let me know what is a good discovery project to tag this ticket with so
this
ticket gets some visibility.
Thanks,
Nuria
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 9:44 AM, Oliver Keyes <okeyes(a)wikimedia.org>
wrote:
>
> On 2 December 2015 at 15:38, Nuria Ruiz <nuria(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
> >>It's true that MediaWiki supports search based solely on the ?search
> >> query
> >> parameter. Regardless of whether title=Special:Search is specified.
> >>This is mostly for legacy reasons as search predates the concept of
> >> special
> >> pages.
> >>However, would it make sense to instead count these as page views for
> >> 'Special:Search'?
> >
> > One thing worth clarifying is that analytics team doesn't own the
> > pageview
> > definition (
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Page_view), we
> > implement it to the best of our ability. Deciding what constitutes a
> > pageview for search falls on the search team as they are the ones
> > that
> > know
> > their functionality best (substitute "search team" by "some
entity
> > with
> > knowledge of mediawiki's search abilities") According to Timo's
> > comment
> > it
> > seems that "?search" requests should be counted as true pageviews but
> > let us
> > know otherwise via phab ticket or this list.
> >
>
> Who does own it?
>
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Nuria
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Federico Leva (Nemo)
> > <nemowiki(a)gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Oliver Keyes, 02/12/2015 18:52:
> >>>
> >>> Via Brian Davis we find out the responsible patch is
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
https://github.com/wikimedia/analytics-refinery-source/commit/05e5da92553db…
> >>
> >>
> >> Context:
> >>
> >>
> >>
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research_talk:Page_view/Archive_1#Parameter…
> >>
> >> Nemo
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Analytics mailing list
> >> Analytics(a)lists.wikimedia.org
> >>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Analytics mailing list
> > Analytics(a)lists.wikimedia.org
> >
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Oliver Keyes
> Count Logula
> Wikimedia Foundation
>
> _______________________________________________
> Analytics mailing list
> Analytics(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
_______________________________________________
Analytics mailing list
Analytics(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
--
Oliver Keyes
Count Logula
Wikimedia Foundation
_______________________________________________
Analytics mailing list
Analytics(a)lists.wikimedia.org