Joel,
Please look at the wiki page for beta features: "The primary purpose of
Beta Features is to allow for Wikimedia designers and engineers (from the
Wikimedia Foundation and community alike) to roll out technical
improvements in an environment where large numbers of users can test, give
feedback, and use these features in real-world settings. "
This is normally what product refers to as "beta". You can, of course,
confirm.
Beta cluster purpose is software testing (not quite the same thing):
Thanks,
Nuria
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Joel Sahleen <jsahleen(a)wikimedia.org>
wrote:
I think there is a confusion between the not so
well named beta
environment (testing environment in labs, which is what our thread refers
to) and being a beta-feature. *If you are a beta-feature you are IN
production and you can get data.*
Thanks for the clarification, Nuria.
The issue, as I understand it, is that Product is asking for metrics on
Content Translation usage "in beta” so they can make a "data-driven"
decision about deployment to production. If what Product means by “in beta”
is “as a beta feature” then we really have no problem. We’ll just have to
wait until after we deploy as a beta feature in January to start collecting
data and doing visualizations.
My understanding, however, is that what Product is asking for is
metrics on Content Translation usage in “the beta environment” where a
group of beta-testers has been using the extension for several months now.
If the event logging data in "the beta environment" is not stable and this
environment is really a software testing environment instead of a beta
testing environment, then we can’t really fulfill Product's request; at
least not by using event logging.
It looks like we need clarification from Product regarding what they
mean by “beta,” and if that turns out to be “the beta environment” then we
will have to work something out.
Thanks,
Joel
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Joel Sahleen <jsahleen(a)wikimedia.org>
wrote:
> +2
>
> If the beta environment isn’t supposed to be used for beta testing, it
> shouldn’t be called beta.
>
> I’m all for grabbing the data and doing our own visualizations, but
> there is no guarantee that any data we grab will be accurate since they
> data in the beta db may be blown up at any time.
>
> Joel Sahleen, Software Engineer
> Language Engineering
> Wikimedia Foundation
> jsahleen(a)wikimedia.org
>
>
>
>
> On Nov 17, 2014, at 11:26 AM, Pau Giner <pginer(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
>
> Dashboards can only be created o production data,
>
>
> From product we are constantly encouraged to be data-driven ("measure
> twice, implement once"). When I read that we need to be in production to
> get metrics, it feels like a circular dependency: Product wants us to have
> numbers that justify the move to production, but Analytics tells us that we
> need to be in production to get those numbers. I think it is worth opening
> a conversation in the Product list to clarify their expectations.
>
> My experience with the Multimedia team was that having the ability to
> visualise metrics and check how those were affected by changes in the
> product has been really useful, and we only wish we could have had such
> metrics available from day one. In addition, Content Translation is being
> used in beta for real work by some users, and we are already missing
> information on how they are doing so. So any idea on how can get and make
> sense of some of this information (apart from manual collection) would be
> appreciated (maybe get the data in a way we could use some quick
> d3-based tool <http://code.shutterstock.com/rickshaw/>?).
>
> Thanks
>
>
> Pau
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Joel Sahleen <jsahleen(a)wikimedia.org>
> wrote:
>
>> On Nov 17, 2014, at 9:13 AM, Nuria Ruiz <nuria(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
>>
>> >Since event logging in beta and production appear to be separate, I
>> was wondering if it would be possible to set up separate dashboards for
>> beta and >production.
>>
>> Dashboards can only be created o production data, Joel. We might blow
>> up data in beta environment database to test something else so there is no
>> guaranteed availability there. It is purely a testing environment.
>>
>>
>> Makes sense I suppose, but if the data in beta is unstable there
>> doesn’t seem much point in doing any of this there, beyond confirming that
>> we are sending valid events, which has already been done. I guess we will
>> just have to wait until we go to production to set things up. It would be
>> nice if we had a real beta environment we could use for beta testing, but
>> that’s a larger issue.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 8:09 AM, Joel Sahleen <jsahleen(a)wikimedia.org
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I wanted to check in on this and confirm where things are at. As far
>>> as I understand, the outstanding issues for beta are:
>>>
>>> 1. We still need to verify that events sent from Content Translation
>>> are being collected in beta. The analytics team is looking into the issues
>>> in beta and Nuria has created a bug
>>> <https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73388> in bugzilla
>>> to track any related work.
>>>
>>> 2. Sometime after Dan gets back from vacation, he and Joel will need
>>> to work together to set up a basic dashboard based on Dan's
>>> instructions
>>> <https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Analytics/Dashboards>. Timing
>>> is dependent on 1. @Dan, let me know what works best for you and how I can
>>> best help.
>>>
>>> Since event logging in beta and production appear to be separate, I
>>> was wondering if it would be possible to set up separate dashboards for
>>> beta and production. That would be very useful for us because it would
>>> allow us to track the usage of languages we release to beta and then use
>>> that data to prioritize the languages we release to production.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Joel
>>>
>>> On Nov 14, 2014, at 11:05 AM, Nuria Ruiz <nuria(a)wikimedia.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> >Joel, Ori looked into this now. There was a problem with EL in
>>> labs which affected logging events from Beta. Ori has fixed the issue, and
>>> the fix is >waiting approval from ops. Let's touch-base tomorrow to
>>> see if we see events.
>>> In order to be able to properly test whether the fix fixes this
>>> issue we need to know what it is.
>>>
>>> There is a bug logged for the situation of beta and EL, can we
>>> please link any commits to this bug?
>>>
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73388
>>>
>>> Also, one thing is the setup of the varnish environment and other
>>> the setup of the eventlogging machine that has not received new code for
>>> quite a while, so I think we have more than one problem here.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 4:48 PM, Leila Zia <leila(a)wikimedia.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> [+ Ori]
>>>>
>>>> Joel, Ori looked into this now. There was a problem with EL in labs
>>>> which affected logging events from Beta. Ori has fixed the issue, and
the
>>>> fix is waiting approval from ops. Let's touch-base tomorrow to see if
we
>>>> see events.
>>>>
>>>> Leila
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Nuria Ruiz <nuria(a)wikimedia.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Joel:
>>>>>
>>>>> I see, I was hoping to set aside the beta issues but if you are
>>>>> not deploying to prod any time soon I guess we will need to
troubleshoot
>>>>> there. By the looks of it EL has not worked in beta since august,
but, as I
>>>>> said before, I know very little about how beta is put together.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have filed a bug to regarding the beta issue:
>>>>>
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73388
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Joel Sahleen <
>>>>> jsahleen(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Nuria,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >Please let me know if there is any way I can help out or if
>>>>>> there is anything you need from our end.
>>>>>> When you have deployed your newest code to production, let's
>>>>>> check whether events appear on the production stream. Let us know
when
>>>>>> deployment is done and you think your code should be logging.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Our code is not scheduled to be released to production until
>>>>>> January. Getting the metrics is partly to help us ensure and
promote that
>>>>>> release. We will keep you informed as our plans progress, but
hopefully we
>>>>>> can figure out what the issue is in beta soon.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To confirm: You have seen proper logging from your events in
>>>>>> vagrant, right?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The output I am seeing with vagrant is what I pasted to this
>>>>>> thread earlier. It does not contain the url-encoded section or
the user
>>>>>> agent information as we discussed before. I think that is an
issue with my
>>>>>> dev environment, however, and not a problem with the code. The
same code
>>>>>> appears to be sending valid events in beta. The http request I
sent to your
>>>>>> email earlier is what we are seeing there. It seems to include
all the
>>>>>> information you said it should include.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you want to debug what is happening in beta yourself, an easy
>>>>>> way I found to do that is:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1. Go to our Content Translation translation view
>>>>>>
<http://en.wikipedia.beta.wmflabs.org/wiki/Special:ContentTranslation?page=Han+Feizi&from=es&to=ca&targettitle=Han+Feizi>
page
>>>>>> in beta (you will need to create an account and sign in)
>>>>>> 2. Open chrome dev tools,
>>>>>> 3. Click the add translation links that appear in the middle
>>>>>> column to add a few machine translated paragraphs to the
editor
>>>>>> 4. Click on the publish button in the header to publish the
>>>>>> translation to your user namespace (triggers EL event)
>>>>>> 5. Look at the network pane in chrome dev tools and find the
>>>>>> entry with the event logging url (it should be near the
bottom).
>>>>>> 6. Click on the entry to see all the request and response
>>>>>> information.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You probably already know all this, but I thought I would pass
it
>>>>>> along just in case it helps.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Di you setup a sampling rate or code is logging 1 to 1?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No sample rate. Just logging 1 to 1.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On our end we will work to troubleshoot the beta EL
>>>>>> infrastructure, I am not familiar with it and neither is anyone
on our team
>>>>>> but we will ask around.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yeah, Dan said you all kind of inherited EL so that’s totally
>>>>>> understandable. We appreciate you looking into this for us. Let
us know how
>>>>>> else we can help.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Joel
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 8:45 AM, Joel Sahleen <
>>>>>> jsahleen(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Nuria,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thank you so much for your help on this. Please let me know
if
>>>>>>> there is any way I can help out or if there is anything you
need from our
>>>>>>> end.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Joel
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Joel Sahleen, Software Engineer
>>>>>>> Language Engineering
>>>>>>> Wikimedia Foundation
>>>>>>> jsahleen(a)wikimedia.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Nov 13, 2014, at 9:42 AM, Nuria Ruiz
<nuria(a)wikimedia.org>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Taking last statement back, asked Yuvi and beta does have a
>>>>>>> varnish instance so the flow of EL events "should"
be the same one that
>>>>>>> production.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Now I looked on deployment-eventlogging02, which is the EL
>>>>>>> machine for labs and the last events I see there are from Aug
22.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So no events have come in as of late, which could point to
an
>>>>>>> issue on the setup. I will look into it some more.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nuria
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Nuria Ruiz <
>>>>>>> nuria(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> To keep archives happy: Beta setup post events to
>>>>>>>>
http://bits.beta.wmflabs.org/event.gif
>>>>>>>> <http://bits.beta.wmflabs.org/event.gif?foo=bar>
that, while
>>>>>>>> it does not look to be varnish, has some kind of listener
that post those
>>>>>>>> events to beta event logging database.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Joel Sahleen <
>>>>>>>> jsahleen(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Niklas,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Can you answer this question from Nuria?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> jsahleen: does beta have its own varnish instance?
where are
>>>>>>>>> you posting your events in beta? can you send teh
url?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Also would it be possible to document the steps you
used when
>>>>>>>>> testing EL on beta so that others can reproduce
them?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Joel
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Joel Sahleen, Software Engineer
>>>>>>>>> Language Engineering
>>>>>>>>> Wikimedia Foundation
>>>>>>>>> jsahleen(a)wikimedia.org
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Nov 12, 2014, at 4:28 AM, Joel Sahleen <
>>>>>>>>> jsahleen(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> (Moving this discussion to analytics@ and
localization-team@
>>>>>>>>> based on Nuria’s suggestion below.)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Leila,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The output I posted in the message is the only output
I am
>>>>>>>>> seeing. I do not see the URL-encoded section or the
validation section. I
>>>>>>>>> think there may be something wrong with my testing
setup.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Niklas Laxstöm has checked what is happening with our
event
>>>>>>>>> logging in beta and he confirmed that we are sending
events and the events
>>>>>>>>> are valid. The issue seems to be that we are logging
events to the beta
>>>>>>>>> event logging db while what we checked earlier was
the production event
>>>>>>>>> logging db.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Can you (or anyone who is available) check the event
logging
>>>>>>>>> db in beta to see if the table has been created and
has data? The schema
>>>>>>>>> name again is ContentTranslation. If you don’t find
anything, let us know
>>>>>>>>> and we will do some more investigation.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If there is data in the beta db the next step would
be to
>>>>>>>>> follow with Dan’s instructions
>>>>>>>>>
<https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Analytics/Dashboards> to
>>>>>>>>> get a dashboard set up on limn1. I believe that most
of Dan’s instructions
>>>>>>>>> need to be handled by someone on the analytics team,
but let me know if
>>>>>>>>> there is anything I can help with.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks again for your help!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Joel
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Joel Sahleen, Software Engineer
>>>>>>>>> Language Engineering
>>>>>>>>> Wikimedia Foundation
>>>>>>>>> jsahleen(a)wikimedia.org
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Nov 11, 2014, at 11:47 PM, Leila Zia
<leila(a)wikimedia.org>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Joel,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> When you log events, the output will be the
URL-encoded
>>>>>>>>> JSON sent by the browser, the event record (similar
to what you pasted in
>>>>>>>>> your email), and whether the event validates against
the schema. For the
>>>>>>>>> sample output you pasted earlier, or another sample
output, can you let us
>>>>>>>>> know if validation section shows Valid?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Leila
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 3:24 PM, Nuria Ruiz <
>>>>>>>>> nuria(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Joel,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> For questions like these going forward you can
contact
>>>>>>>>>> analytics@ as you will be getting amore prompt
response.
>>>>>>>>>> Both Dan and Leila are OOTO the next couple of
days.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> >There are configuration options for the dev
server that
>>>>>>>>>> need to be added. Do similar options need to be
added when not using the
>>>>>>>>>> dev server?
>>>>>>>>>> No, there is no need.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You would need sample rates to determine at which
sampling
>>>>>>>>>> rate you are logging if you are not logging all
events, that is.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Nuria
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Dan Andreescu
<
>>>>>>>>>> dandreescu(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Adding Nuria as she can probably help
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, November 10, 2014, Joel Sahleen
<
>>>>>>>>>>> jsahleen(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Leila,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I have tested our EventLogging code and
it seems to be
>>>>>>>>>>>> working fine with the event logging dev
server. I can see the events coming
>>>>>>>>>>>> through and they are valid. Here is some
sample output:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> {"wiki": "wiki",
"uuid":
>>>>>>>>>>>>
"e9dde14cf18552269ae81a7897f45d0c", "webHost": "localhost",
"timestamp":
>>>>>>>>>>>> 1415651367, "clientValidated":
true, "recvFrom": "1.0.0.127.in-addr.arpa",
>>>>>>>>>>>> "seqId": 2,
"clientIp": "80f7683f3565e3d365740a1c8d1771ba95caaaaa",
>>>>>>>>>>>> "schema":
"ContentTranslation", "event": {"action":
>>>>>>>>>>>> "create-translated-page",
"targetLanguage": "ca", "token": "Tester",
>>>>>>>>>>>> "version": 1,
"contentLanguage": "es"}, "revision": 7146627}
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Are there additional configuration
options we need to add
>>>>>>>>>>>> to get EL working aside from just
requiring the main extension file. There
>>>>>>>>>>>> are configuration options for the dev
server that need to be added. Do
>>>>>>>>>>>> similar options need to be added when not
using the dev server?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Any help on this would be much
appreciated.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Joel
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 7, 2014, at 3:52 PM, Joel Sahleen
<
>>>>>>>>>>>> jsahleen(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> No problem, Dan. Enjoy your vacation!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I will read through the document at the
link you sent. I
>>>>>>>>>>>> still need to fix our event logging code
so it may be a couple days before
>>>>>>>>>>>> we are ready anyway. If I have any
questions I will contact Leila or Nuria.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Joel
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Joel Sahleen, Software Engineer
>>>>>>>>>>>> Language Engineering
>>>>>>>>>>>> Wikimedia Foundation
>>>>>>>>>>>> jsahleen(a)wikimedia.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 7, 2014, at 3:10 PM, Dan Andreescu
<
>>>>>>>>>>>> dandreescu(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Joel, re: visualization,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm going on vacation tomorrow and
will be back on November
>>>>>>>>>>>> 19th. If that's not too late, I can
set up a limn instance then. If it's
>>>>>>>>>>>> too late, that's ok, I wrote up the
steps needed. Someone with access to
>>>>>>>>>>>> the limn1.eqiad.wmflabs instance can
perform them:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Analytics/Dashboards
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> If you have the data or are generating
the data in some
>>>>>>>>>>>> other way, then you don't need half
of that setup, you just need the part
>>>>>>>>>>>> that sets up the limn dashboard which is
only an hour or so of work. Sorry
>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm running out the door and
can't take care of that for you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Dan
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 7:37 AM, Joel
Sahleen <
>>>>>>>>>>>> jsahleen(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you for the information, Pau.
Very helpful. As you
>>>>>>>>>>>>> say, this does not change our current
plans or hold us up in any way. I was
>>>>>>>>>>>>> just wasn’t clear about the
relationship between the "high priorities" and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "other metrics” sections.
Knowing these came from different people at
>>>>>>>>>>>>> different times clarifies things a
lot.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Joel
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 7, 2014, at 3:44 AM, Pau Giner
<
>>>>>>>>>>>>> pginer(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Pau, @Amir There is a section called
High priorities for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> product management
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
<https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Content_translation/analytics#High_priorities_for_product_management>
on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Content translation analytics
page. Did these priorities come from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> outside the team or does this
just represent our own internal view of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> high priorities?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here is the story of that page as
I'm aware of it:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In September 2013, I was in a meeting
with the analytics
>>>>>>>>>>>>> team in SF presentingan initial
proposal for metrics
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
<https://docs.google.com/a/wikimedia.org/presentation/d/1V1XLV7jUcAtco5ZC49SNTt3VecH7hARZ6vqbSFGnOYc/edit?usp=sharing>.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On that meeting, Dario recommended to
create hierarchy of metrics based on
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the project goals. I created such
image and a description for those metrics
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (the image is on top of our analytics
page and the metrics are described in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> what it now the "Other metrics
for created articles" section.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In a meeting between Amir and Howie,
they captured which
>>>>>>>>>>>>> should be the most important metrics
from the product perspective in the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "High priorities for product
management". If I recalled correctly, as an
>>>>>>>>>>>>> outcome of later meetings between
Howie and Amir, Howie was happy focusing
>>>>>>>>>>>>> on articles published as a single
(initial?) metric for success. Amir can
>>>>>>>>>>>>> provide more details since I was not
on those meetings.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In short: The analytics page
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
<https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Content_translation/analytics>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> has pieces contributed by different
people during the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> last year, and although there are
many ideas to organise and detail,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> measuring the number of published
articles seems to be the solid candidate
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to get started with, learn from the
value we get from it and polish the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> rest of ourgoal-to-signal process
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
<http://www.rodden.org/kerry/heart/> for detecting better
>>>>>>>>>>>>> metrics.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 1:57 AM, Joel
Sahleen <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> jsahleen(a)wikimedia.org>wroteote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have been reviewing our
requirements for Content
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> translation analytics
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
<https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Content_translation/analytics> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have a few questions/requests.
I am sending them to the language team
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> list and Leila and Dan in the
hopes of getting some more clarity. I will
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> add the same content to the
Trello card.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In the weekly team meeting
earlier today we agreed that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the first metric we want to
collect data for is the number of articles
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> created in each language over
time. This is something has Amir has already
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> set up our current Event Logging
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
<https://git.wikimedia.org/blob/mediawiki/extensions/ContentTranslation/89b6284f06b4419ddec6dcccee0eed500f267100/modules/eventlogging/ext.cx.eventlogging.js>
to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> track. Now that Kartik has
enabled EL in beta, that part should be done.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Since we are only barely turning
it on, there will be very little data
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> until people create more articles
using CX. However, we should be set up to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> collect any new data that comes
in.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Leila, can you verify that the
db table now exists for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the ContentTranslation schema
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Schema:ContentTranslation>?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If it doesn’t, can you point us
to right people we need to work with to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> troubleshoot the issue? Also you
mentioned in our meeting that personal
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> data may soon be purged after 90
days as part of a new privacy policy.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could you explain that a bit more
or point us to more information? If this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is the case, it may affect some
of the metrics we would like to collect in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the future.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Dan, what do we need to do next
in order to set up a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> very simple visualization that
would show the number of articles created
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> per week by language. Pau has an
image of what he would like on the Trello
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> card
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
<https://trello.com/c/vQm0hlkt/18-content-translation-analytics>.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You mentioned something about
being able to host a dashboard for us on one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the Limn servers you already
have set up.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Santhosh, I believe you said
earlier you have a script
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you use to export the data for
the ULS analytics. If so can you share that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> please in case we need a similar
script for CX so I don’t have to write a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> new script from scratch?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Pau, @Amir There is a section
called High priorities
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for product management
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
<https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Content_translation/analytics#High_priorities_for_product_management>
on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Content translation analytics
page. Did these priorities come from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> outside the team or does this
just represent our own internal view of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> high priorities? If the latter,
have these priorities
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> been reviewed by anyone outside
the team? I think we are safe to proceed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with our current plan, but it
would be good to have product sign off on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things more generally.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Joel
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Joel Sahleen, Software Engineer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Language Engineering
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wikimedia Foundation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jsahleen(a)wikimedia.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
_______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Localisation-team mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Localisation-team(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/localisation-team
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pau Giner
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Interaction Designer
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wikimedia Foundation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
_______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Localisation-team mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Localisation-team(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/localisation-team
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> Analytics mailing list
>>>>>>>>> Analytics(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>>>>>>>>>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Localisation-team mailing list
>>>>>>> Localisation-team(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>>>>>>>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/localisation-team
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Analytics mailing list
>>>>>>> Analytics(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>>>>>>>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Localisation-team mailing list
>>>>>> Localisation-team(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>>>>>>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/localisation-team
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Analytics mailing list
>>>>>> Analytics(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>>>>>>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Analytics mailing list
>>>>> Analytics(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>>>>>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Analytics mailing list
>>>> Analytics(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>>>>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Localisation-team mailing list
>>> Localisation-team(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>>>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/localisation-team
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Analytics mailing list
>>> Analytics(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>>>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Localisation-team mailing list
>> Localisation-team(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/localisation-team
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Localisation-team mailing list
>> Localisation-team(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/localisation-team
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Pau Giner
> Interaction Designer
> Wikimedia Foundation
> _______________________________________________
> Localisation-team mailing list
> Localisation-team(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/localisation-team
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Analytics mailing list
> Analytics(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
>
>
_______________________________________________
Localisation-team mailing list
Localisation-team(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/localisation-team
_______________________________________________
Analytics mailing list
Analytics(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
_______________________________________________
Localisation-team mailing list
Localisation-team(a)lists.wikimedia.org