On 11 February 2013 16:37, John Byrne <john(a)bodkinprints.co.uk> wrote:
What we had is best described as "a delay in
agreeing terms for the
donation" or similar.
A good line. And if the full unredacted text of the negotiations was
published people would have more data to weigh its validity. Yes I
know that isn't going to happen.
And since that isn't going to happen you are going to have to accept
that people are going to look at what data we do have (particularly
with regards to timing) and draw other rather different conclusions.
Equally those drawing those conclusions are going to have to accept
that we are unlikely to receive even an acknowledgment of our position
let alone a meaningful response. That being the case its best to
accept that things worked out okey in the end and move on.
For example the next issue is how WMUK plans to pay for the upkeep of
QRpedia given that it wasn't in the budget.
--
geni