On 11 Feb 2013, at 20:02, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Feb 11, 2013 7:59 PM, "geni"
<geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
For example the next issue is how WMUK plans to pay for the upkeep of
QRpedia given that it wasn't in the budget.
There shouldn't be an issue there. The costs are minimal. Renewal costs for two
domain names and maybe a few hours work by the existing IT contractors to transition
things and sort out the security concerns that have been raised. The budget can absorb
that.
The need to have developer resources available to set up QRpedia on WMUK servers, and to
maintain and improve it, has been thought about for a while now and was incorporated into
this year's developer budget (although the activity plan doesn't explicitly state
this).
Thanks,
Mike