Richard & Paula, Yes, this is related to the notice we were receiving last week about the Wikipedia Main page appearing out-of-date. This problem will solve itself over time. How great to see this amazing progress though! Congrats on the work done. As I mentioned way back in my initial comments on the AfD for your list of 100 most notable works, I think this is a great idea, well within scope for Wikipedia, and a noble goal to strive for 100 articles on each painting. Go for it! If I have time I will chime in. Hopefully your project will inspire other museums to produce such lists. As a sidenote, it's nice to see that the most recent addition to this list (added yesterday) links to my most recent article added yesterday that in turn links to another project posted here: Smarthistory. Cross-pollination of GLAM project articles - I LOVE IT!! Jane 2013/1/27 Paula Kate Marmor <pkm(a)pobox.com>

Thanks for all of your positive feedback! I'll pass it on to Zambonia, too! The IMA's e-Volunteer program has inspired the Royal Ontario Museum to start the same project, but I'm not sure how far along they are. Here's a link to their page: http://www.rom.on.ca/en/join-us/volunteer/e-volunteering-wikipedia And their hub in WP: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Public_art/EVolunteerPla… This project was started by Ryan Dodge: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:WRyanDodge Speaking of cross-pollination, we benefited recently from the addition of a bunch of high-quality images (156 to be exact): http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Google_Art_Project_works_in_Indi… Thanks for all of your help! Best, Richard From: Jane Darnell [mailto:jane023@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2013 5:38 AM To: Wikimedia & GLAM collaboration [Public] Subject: Re: [GLAM] IMA e-Volunteer Program update and question Richard & Paula, Yes, this is related to the notice we were receiving last week about the Wikipedia Main page appearing out-of-date. This problem will solve itself over time. How great to see this amazing progress though! Congrats on the work done. As I mentioned way back in my initial comments on the AfD for your list of 100 most notable works, I think this is a great idea, well within scope for Wikipedia, and a noble goal to strive for 100 articles on each painting. Go for it! If I have time I will chime in. Hopefully your project will inspire other museums to produce such lists. As a sidenote, it's nice to see that the most recent addition to this list (added yesterday) links to my most recent article added yesterday that in turn links to another project posted here: Smarthistory. Cross-pollination of GLAM project articles - I LOVE IT!! Jane 2013/1/27 Paula Kate Marmor <pkm@pobox.com<mailto:pkm@pobox.com>> What's happening with that template is that the version appearing on the articles is a couple of weeks out of date. All the red links that are blue when you look at the template directly are pages where the underlying link has been changed, even though the text displayed on the page is the same. I'm guessing this is related to caching of template data in the aftermath of our server move over the last few days. I'll post something at the Village Pump and see if we can get it sorted. On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 6:48 PM, Paula Kate Marmor <pkm@pobox.com<mailto:pkm@pobox.com>> wrote: Richard, I'll take a look at the template and see what's going on. The layout of that sort of template is pretty standard. It's possible to add images, but with the wide range of screen sizes we're dealing with these days, I don't recommend it. Paula Pkm@pobox.com<mailto:Pkm@pobox.com> On Saturday, January 26, 2013, Richard McCoy wrote: Hi all, I wanted to take a minute to tell you a bit about the IMA e-Volunteer program, one that has been in place for a few years now. Link here: http://www.imamuseum.org/support/volunteer While there haven't been a great number of people to work on it, there has been on outstanding e-Volunteer who has done a ton of work, Zambonia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Zambonia). As you can see on her user page she has created a huge number of high-quality articles about IMA artworks (and also spent a great deal of time researching the 100 most important artworks in the collection): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/100_Most_Significant_Artworks_at_the_Indianapo… Beyond just bragging about her work, I wanted to put a question to you all: The Template seems to be broken ... it is no longer showing blue links when it's used as a template in an article, but when you see the template separately it shows blue links. Thoughts? Can anyone fix this? Example: Aricle showing many links as red: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peasant_with_a_Wheelbarrow The template showing many other links blue: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Indianapolis_Museum_of_Art_artworks (Also if anyone had ideas or wanted to help make that Template look cooler, we're all ears!) Many thanks, Richard Richard McCoy Conservator of Objects & Variable Art Indianapolis Museum of Art 4000 Michigan Road Indianapolis, IN 46208 317-923-1331<tel:317-923-1331> xt 150 ________________________________ This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact Richard McCoy by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. _______________________________________________ GLAM mailing list GLAM@lists.wikimedia.org<mailto:GLAM@lists.wikimedia.org> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glam ________________________________ This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact Richard McCoy by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.

Richard & Paula, Yes, this is related to the notice we were receiving last week about the Wikipedia Main page appearing out-of-date. This problem will solve itself over time. How great to see this amazing progress though! Congrats on the work done. As I mentioned way back in my initial comments on the AfD for your list of 100 most notable works, I think this is a great idea, well within scope for Wikipedia, and a noble goal to strive for 100 articles on each painting. Go for it! If I have time I will chime in. Hopefully your project will inspire other museums to produce such lists. As a sidenote, it's nice to see that the most recent addition to this list (added yesterday) links to my most recent article added yesterday that in turn links to another project posted here: Smarthistory. Cross-pollination of GLAM project articles - I LOVE IT!! Jane 2013/1/27 Paula Kate Marmor < <mailto:pkm@pobox.com> pkm(a)pobox.com&gt; What's happening with that template is that the version appearing on the articles is a couple of weeks out of date. All the red links that are blue when you look at the template directly are pages where the underlying link has been changed, even though the text displayed on the page is the same. I'm guessing this is related to caching of template data in the aftermath of our server move over the last few days. I'll post something at the Village Pump and see if we can get it sorted. On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 6:48 PM, Paula Kate Marmor < <mailto:pkm@pobox.com> pkm(a)pobox.com&gt; wrote: Richard, I'll take a look at the template and see what's going on. The layout of that sort of template is pretty standard. It's possible to add images, but with the wide range of screen sizes we're dealing with these days, I don't recommend it. Paula <mailto:Pkm@pobox.com> Pkm(a)pobox.com On Saturday, January 26, 2013, Richard McCoy wrote: Hi all, Da: glam-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org [mailto:glam-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org] Per conto di Richard McCoy Inviato: domenica 27 gennaio 2013 14.12 A: Wikimedia & GLAM collaboration [Public] Oggetto: Re: [GLAM] IMA e-Volunteer Program update and question Thanks for all of your positive feedback! I'll pass it on to Zambonia, too! The IMA's e-Volunteer program has inspired the Royal Ontario Museum to start the same project, but I'm not sure how far along they are. Here's a link to their page: http://www.rom.on.ca/en/join-us/volunteer/e-volunteering-wikipedia And their hub in WP: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Public_art/EVolunteerPlan /ROM This project was started by Ryan Dodge: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:WRyanDodge Speaking of cross-pollination, we benefited recently from the addition of a bunch of high-quality images (156 to be exact): http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Google_Art_Project_works_in_India napolis_Museum_of_Art Thanks for all of your help! Best, Richard From: Jane Darnell [mailto:jane023@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2013 5:38 AM To: Wikimedia & GLAM collaboration [Public] Subject: Re: [GLAM] IMA e-Volunteer Program update and question Richard & Paula, Yes, this is related to the notice we were receiving last week about the Wikipedia Main page appearing out-of-date. This problem will solve itself over time. How great to see this amazing progress though! Congrats on the work done. As I mentioned way back in my initial comments on the AfD for your list of 100 most notable works, I think this is a great idea, well within scope for Wikipedia, and a noble goal to strive for 100 articles on each painting. Go for it! If I have time I will chime in. Hopefully your project will inspire other museums to produce such lists. As a sidenote, it's nice to see that the most recent addition to this list (added yesterday) links to my most recent article added yesterday that in turn links to another project posted here: Smarthistory. Cross-pollination of GLAM project articles - I LOVE IT!! Jane 2013/1/27 Paula Kate Marmor &lt;pkm(a)pobox.com&gt; What's happening with that template is that the version appearing on the articles is a couple of weeks out of date. All the red links that are blue when you look at the template directly are pages where the underlying link has been changed, even though the text displayed on the page is the same. I'm guessing this is related to caching of template data in the aftermath of our server move over the last few days. I'll post something at the Village Pump and see if we can get it sorted. On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 6:48 PM, Paula Kate Marmor &lt;pkm(a)pobox.com&gt; wrote: Richard, I'll take a look at the template and see what's going on. The layout of that sort of template is pretty standard. It's possible to add images, but with the wide range of screen sizes we're dealing with these days, I don't recommend it. Paula Pkm(a)pobox.com On Saturday, January 26, 2013, Richard McCoy wrote: Hi all, I wanted to take a minute to tell you a bit about the IMA e-Volunteer program, one that has been in place for a few years now. Link here: http://www.imamuseum.org/support/volunteer While there haven't been a great number of people to work on it, there has been on outstanding e-Volunteer who has done a ton of work, Zambonia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Zambonia). As you can see on her user page she has created a huge number of high-quality articles about IMA artworks (and also spent a great deal of time researching the 100 most important artworks in the collection): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/100_Most_Significant_Artworks_at_the_Indianapol is_Museum_of_Art Beyond just bragging about her work, I wanted to put a question to you all: The Template seems to be broken . it is no longer showing blue links when it's used as a template in an article, but when you see the template separately it shows blue links. Thoughts? Can anyone fix this? Example: Aricle showing many links as red: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peasant_with_a_Wheelbarrow The template showing many other links blue: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Indianapolis_Museum_of_Art_artworks (Also if anyone had ideas or wanted to help make that Template look cooler, we're all ears!) Many thanks, Richard Richard McCoy Conservator of Objects & Variable Art Indianapolis Museum of Art 4000 Michigan Road Indianapolis, IN 46208 317-923-1331 xt 150 _____ This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact Richard McCoy by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. _______________________________________________ GLAM mailing list GLAM(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glam _____ This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact Richard McCoy by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.