Hi Peter,
I was aware of the issue you describe - not the least because it has
happened quite a lot to us at Europeana! I've noted though that
citations and references are more well received than external links? Is
this correct?
I also get the impression it's more welcome if citations, references and
links are added by a Wikipedia in Residence rather than a staff member.
Note though that there's an increasing trend to take on Wikipedians in
Residence as paid staff which might muddle the waters a bit in that
regard.
So basically, we ourselves (i.e. our staff) have stopped adding external
links to Europeana (or our partners), stopped any plans at systematic
link additions and rely instead on the Wikipedia community itself to use
our portal and exhibitions Cite on Wikipedia functions.
We do some limited uploads of content to Wikimedia Commons and arrange
editathons around such content, but only in collaboration with Wikipedia
Chapters. However, Wikimedia Commons uploads are not very effective in
driving referral traffic to GLAMs and the media are used in articles in
way that rarely references the institution. The latter can be
de-motivating to GLAMs so I have a lot of sympathy for these
suggestions,
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Martsniez/attribute
and
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Dominic/Image_citation which
would, IMHO, also reinforce the cite your sources ethos of Wikipedia.
Cheers,
David
---
Product Developer
www.europeana.eu
Phone: +31 (0)70 3140 696
Mobile: +31 (0)64 217 2542
Email: david.haskiya(a)kb.nl
Skype: davidhaskiya
-----Original Message-----
From: glam-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org [mailto:glam-
bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Peter Ekman
Sent: maandag 18 maart 2013 17:48
To: glam(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: [GLAM] The right way to add external links?
David and Sumana have passed on info from two outside projects that
have added external links to Wikipedia articles and measured the
results. I don't doubt the good faith of anybody here, nor the
usefulness of the links, but I must note that this type of activity is
almost certain to attract the attention of the hardworking (and
equally good-faith) anti-spammers at WP:WikiProject SPAM. There's
also a question of WP:COI involved.
As far as the attention grabbing aspect, please consider the following
list from WP:WikiProject Spam of things that the anti-spammers look
for:
"How to identify spam and spammers
1.User is anonymous (an IP address)
2. User:page and/or User_talk:page are red links
3. No edit summary (other than, perhaps /* External links */)
4. User has made only one edit, which consisted of inserting a link
5. User has made multiple edits to related articles
6. The majority of user's edits are to external links sections"
There are 14 more points - but the two projects likely raised at least
3 of these red flags already.
Many Wikipedians absolutely hate spammers, and if an outside project
raises these red-flags they are likely to get a bad result, just
wasting their time. I do not have the complete answer of how to do
this right and completely within Wikipedia rules, but I think the
question needs to be raised.
Another example - just from this week. An anon apparently from the
Society of Architectural Historians added a bunch of links to a new
feature of their website which gives (gratis) text from their series
of expensive books "Buildings of the United States". On my watchlist
I saw red flags 1-3 at a glance and my first thought was spam. On
closer examination, I saw it had all the attributes of spam, except
that I really found the links useful. Others started deleting the
links right away, and I had to take some time to defend the links.
Clearly there is a problem here, which an uncritical reading of the 2
above projects would fail to address.
As I said - I don't completely know how to solve this problem, but my
first reaction is that they should try to work with established
Wikipedia editors.
I think I have to mention some of my recent related Wikipedia
activities. I've been working on WP:Glam/smarthistory to insert
external links (via the external media template) to Smarthistory's
very useful and informative series of videos on art history. As far
as I know, only one of these links has been deleted and there have
been no complaints to the spam project, but there has been a bit of
tension, simply because external links are involved. This is despite
the fact that I am a completely independent editor with a long visible
history of fighting against COI-editing.
In short - a straightforward reading of the 2 outside projects'
write-ups is likely to lead to some problems. We should try to thrash
out how to avoid these problems.
Pete Ekman
User:Smallbones
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 09:36:56 +0100
> From: "David Haskiya" <David.Haskiya(a)KB.nl>
> To: "Wikimedia & GLAM collaboration [Public]"
> <glam(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
> Subject: Re: [GLAM] case study with statistics: libraries & archives
> should share on Wikipedia
> Message-ID: <9E81C54D7C665F4599EA05450BA9853D023888A8@goofy>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Hi,
> You may know of it already but in case you don't.
>
> The Biodiversity Heritage Library also published an interesting case
> study on the effects of citing/referencing to their authoritative
> sources on zoology, botany etc.:
>
>
http://blog.biodiversitylibrary.org/2012/03/linking-to-biodiversity-heri
> tage.html
>
> Cheers,
> David
>
> ---
> Product Developer
>
www.europeana.eu
>
> Phone: +31 (0)70 3140 696
> Mobile: +31 (0)64 217 2542
> Email: david.haskiya(a)kb.nl
> Skype: davidhaskiya
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: glam-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org [mailto:glam-
>> bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Sumana Harihareswara
>> Sent: zaterdag 16 maart 2013 18:32
>> To: Research into Wikimedia content and communities;
>> glam(a)lists.wikimedia.org; A mailinglist for the Analytics Team at
WMF
> and
>> everybody who has aninterest in Wikipedia and analytics.
>> Subject: [GLAM] case study with statistics: libraries & archives
> should
>> share on Wikipedia
>>
>>
http://www.dlib.org/dlib/march13/szajewski/03szajewski.html
>>
>> "This case study examines the use of Wikipedia by the Ball State
>> University Libraries as an opportunity to raise the visibility of
>> digitized historic sheet music assets made available in the
> university's
>> Digital Media Repository. By adding links to specific items in this
>> collection to relevant, existing Wikipedia articles, Ball State
>> successfully and efficiently expanded the user base of this
collection
>> in the Digital Media Repository by vastly
enhancing the
> discoverability
>> of the collection's assets...
>>
>> "The results of this study show that the addition of links from
> relevant
>> Wikipedia articles to individual digitized assets in the Hague
Sheet
>> Music Collection in the Ball State University
Digital Media
Repository
>> was an overwhelming success. Despite the fact
that only 57 links to
40
>> assets were added to Wikipedia articles,
pageviews for the
collection
> of
>> 149 assets roughly tripled as a result of this effort. The adding
of
>> links at the item level provided a plethora
of highly-visible entry
>> points to this collection's assets, raising awareness of the
existence
>> of these resources to interested Internet
users who were previously
>> unaware of these materials, as is suggested by the collection's use
>> statistics. The success of this initiative is also remarkable in
its
>> efficiency, generating a large number of new
digital patrons while
>> requiring relatively little time to plan and execute."
>>
>> Includes an encouraging graph. :-)
>> --
>> Sumana Harihareswara
>> Engineering Community Manager
>> Wikimedia Foundation
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> GLAM mailing list
>> GLAM(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glam
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 07:48:35 -0400
> From: Sumana Harihareswara <sumanah(a)wikimedia.org>
> To: "A mailing list for the Analytics Team at WMF and everybody who
> has an interest in Wikipedia and analytics."
> <analytics(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
> Cc: "Wikimedia & GLAM collaboration \[Public\]"
> <glam(a)lists.wikimedia.org>rg>, Lars Aronsson
<lars(a)aronsson.se>
> Subject: Re: [GLAM] [Analytics] case study with
statistics:
libraries
&
archives should share on Wikipedia
Message-ID: <5146FF13.7030503(a)wikimedia.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On 03/18/2013 07:09 AM, Lars Aronsson wrote:
> Sumana Harihareswara cited:
>>
http://www.dlib.org/dlib/march13/szajewski/03szajewski.html
>>
>> "The results of this study show that the addition of links from
relevant
>>> Wikipedia articles to individual digitized assets in the Hague
Sheet
>>> Music Collection in the Ball State
University Digital Media
Repository
>>> was an overwhelming success. Despite the
fact that only 57 links
to 40
>>> assets were added to Wikipedia articles,
pageviews for the
collection
of
>>> 149 assets roughly tripled as a result of this effort.
>>
>> Do we know to what degree archives and libraries succeed
>> to actually benefit from an increased web audience?
>> I'm trying to understand Swedish archives and libraries.
>> Some of them measure web traffic, but none seems to
>> care if the numbers are large or small. It's not like a
>> revenue stream to them.
>
> Lars, I shall defer to the GLAM experts, but take a look at
>
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Analytics/Pageviews/GLAM . "To
stimulate
> GLAMs to upload content to Wikimedia Commons, it
is necessary to be
able
> to communicate how many times these media files
are being presented
to
users of
Wikimedia projects. Being able to communicate these numbers
helps policymakers to integrate Wikipedia into their communications
policy and helps them justify contributing time and knowledge to
Wikimedia projects."
--
Sumana Harihareswara
Engineering Community Manager
Wikimedia Foundation
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
GLAM mailing list
GLAM(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glam
End of GLAM Digest, Vol 20, Issue 7
***********************************
_______________________________________________
GLAM mailing list
GLAM(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glam