On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 4:05 AM, Tim Landscheidt tim@tim-landscheidt.de wrote:
(anonymous) wrote:
until now I had the impression that we (you, the authors, and me) fight together against WMF and WMDE for keeping the Toolserver and against Labs. Some mails and discussion in the last days gives me now the impression that this was wrong and (at least some of) you are eager to leave the toolserver as soon as possible. There is no point to beg the WMDE for new hardware and to invest much more time if 2 weeks after Labs is "ready" the toolserver will be empty. For this reason I created a survey at [1] that starts at midnight. Please take a moment of your time and place your nick in the section that suits you.
Sincerely, DaB.
I wish there were an option saying "move when XXX and YYY features are available and / or provided better on Labs".
That's "move as soon as possible".
That's not exactly the same, especially when I add the clause "provided better on Labs".
When some features I require are poorly available on Labs, it's still "possible to move", but in the case that, if I decide to move, I have to - for example - work around many issues on Labs, or have some more difficult development work to do in order to utilize those features on Labs, I'll still still stay on Toolserver.
-Liangent
Tim
Toolserver-l mailing list (Toolserver-l@lists.wikimedia.org) https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l Posting guidelines for this list: https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Mailing_list_etiquette