On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 4:05 AM, Tim Landscheidt <tim(a)tim-landscheidt.de> wrote:
(anonymous) wrote:
> until now I had the impression that we (you,
the authors, and me) fight
> together against WMF and WMDE for keeping the Toolserver and against Labs.
> Some mails and discussion in the last days gives me now the impression that
> this was wrong and (at least some of) you are eager to leave the toolserver as
> soon as possible.
> There is no point to beg the WMDE for new hardware and to invest much more
> time if 2 weeks after Labs is "ready" the toolserver will be empty. For
this
> reason I created a survey at [1] that starts at midnight. Please take a moment
> of your time and place your nick in the section that suits you.
> Sincerely,
> DaB.
I wish there were an option saying "move
when XXX and YYY features are
available and / or provided better on Labs".
That's "move as soon as possible".
That's not exactly the same, especially when I add the clause
"provided better on Labs".
When some features I require are poorly available on Labs, it's still
"possible to move", but in the case that, if I decide to move, I have
to - for example - work around many issues on Labs, or have some more
difficult development work to do in order to utilize those features on
Labs, I'll still still stay on Toolserver.
-Liangent
Tim
_______________________________________________
Toolserver-l mailing list (Toolserver-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org)
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l
Posting guidelines for this list:
https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Mailing_list_etiquette