On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 1:56 PM, MZMcBride z@mzmcbride.com wrote:
It's almost as though you're encouraging bikeshedding.[1] I imagine most developers don't give a damn what you call it as long as it works well. I'm certainly in that category.
There are a lot of obstacles to overcome in order to develop a decent, working translation tool. The focus of any discussion should be on those actual, real obstacles, not on naming. :-)
I had the same thoughts when I read your e-mail. I was like "ooh, yay, someone's doing this!" and then I read more and was like "wow, are we really talking about all of this stuff? so confusing and pointless. =["
You don't need to come up with complicated names, especially not yet. :-) Just work on writing it and fixing issues, and then we can think of coming up with a name that's straightforward and useful.