On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Kalan kalan.001@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 01:03, Krinkle krinklemail@gmail.com wrote:
However it's not meant for timelines, use rev_timestamp instead.
However, revisions having same rev_timestamp still should be ordered by rev_id. There are pages that have had more than edit per second, and this would ensure that the ordering is really correct.
No, no they shouldn't. Being an autoincrement field you shouldn't be using rev_id like that.