On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Kalan <kalan.001(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 01:03, Krinkle
<krinklemail(a)gmail.com> wrote:
However it's not meant for timelines, use
rev_timestamp
instead.
However, revisions having same rev_timestamp still should be ordered
by rev_id. There are pages that have had more than edit per second,
and this would ensure that the ordering is really correct.
No, no they shouldn't.
Being an autoincrement field you shouldn't be using rev_id like that.