Hi all - thanks for your responses
@JP - Thanks for your support and the correspondence we had before we submitted the proposal was instrumental.
@HalanTul - the project is still in the proposal stage and hopefully it is approved, then we’ll move full speed ahead. If the project receives the green light, we’ll be publishing the ongoing mapping on our website (https://ActivismoLenguas.org https://activismolenguas.org/, but most likely in Spanish to begin), but also on a meta page where it can be translated into a number of languages. While primarily this will be for a Latin American audience, we know that it will also be of interest to a global audience, so we hope that this will allow for a more multilingual presentation and information exchange. But, hopefully the project can receive some good feedback and additional endorsements so that we can make it a reality.
@AlanKing - Thanks for that background information, definitely you are one of the people on the early list of individuals/groups with whom we would like to speak to learn more about your work with the Wikipedias in the Central American languages. What you provided is precisely the background information that is valuable for anyone wanting to learn about the challenges facing each of the projects, as I imagine that similar incubator projects have experienced much of the same. If the project is approved, I’m sure we’ll be returning to you for additional input.
On Aug 16, 2016, at 2:11 PM, languages-request@lists.wikimedia.org wrote:
Send Languages mailing list submissions to languages@lists.wikimedia.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/languages or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to languages-request@lists.wikimedia.org
You can reach the person managing the list at languages-owner@lists.wikimedia.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Languages digest..."
Today's Topics:
- Re: Wikimedia Grants Proposal - Strengthening Indigenous-Language Wikipedias in Latin America (Alan King)
Message: 1 Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 19:02:14 +0000 (UTC) From: Alan King alanrking@yahoo.com To: Languages discussion and Wikimedia Indigenous Languages languages@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: Re: [Languages] Wikimedia Grants Proposal - Strengthening Indigenous-Language Wikipedias in Latin America Message-ID: 211896303.527769.1471374134551@mail.yahoo.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Hi.
Thanks for reaching out to me. I am interested in helping if I can though my availability may be limited, but I will try to provide useful input if that is helpful.
I am unclear about the mechanics of participation in the project. If this is not the right place for the information I'll give here, could you kindly transfer it to the right place or indicate what I am supposed to do? I am going to write some introductory notes here that are meant to help to clarify my relation to indigenous language projects in Wikipedia. This may perhaps serve a double purpose vis-à-vis your project, by providing a bit of knowledge about one person's past experiences and difficulties in this regard, while also suggesting how if at all I may possibly be of further use to you. My work ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_R._King ) involves several indigenous languages in Central America, but the language I have primarily worked on and the only one relevant to my experience on Wikipedia to date is Nawat, aka Pipil.
I am a linguist (and professional translator) but my work involves language recovery and documentation focused on reconstruction. I have worked in collaboration with Nawat and other Central American (CA) indigenous community and support group initiatives over a fifteen-year period, prior to which I worked in Europe on Basque and other minority languages of the world for several decades. Evidence of my CA language work may be found, for example, at the new Tushik website which I built this year ( http://tushik.org/ ).
I lived in El Salvador and worked personally with people in the Nawat movement for over two years before moving back to Europe where I now live and from where I have continued to support the Nawat and other language movements down to the present (I live in the Basque Country). At the present time I am focusing mainly on reconstruction of two related indigenous languages, both called Lenca, with communities in southern Honduras and eastern El Salvador, whose languages ceased to be spoken in the 20th century but members of these communities are interested in recovering them. Needless to say I am also still supporting the Nawat movement in various ways. But as regards Lenca, at the present early stage, my work is basically linguistic documentation, though the results of this work are going to be channelled towards an ambitious government-supported school project in conjunction with local communities within the historical Honduras Lenca region.
My work on indigenous languages has the support of private sponsors but is largely voluntary; I also translate to support myself financially. I am not formally affiliated with any state, official or academic institutions and would describe my activity in support of indigenous language movements as freelance and partly unpaid.
The internet and social media have played a very large in providing the channels and tools that make possible the projects I am involved in. I have worked on a number of internet platforms. Two approaches I have exploited heavily are Facebook groups and dedicated websites (such as Tushik). Another one which I tried quite hard to weave into this network is Wikipedia (and other Wikimedia projects: Wikinews in particular, but also Wikibooks).
I was already a Wikipedia editor prior to this ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:A_R_King ), working in the English wikipedia and also some others, so when I started working on Nawat on wikipedia I was not a novice editor. I tried to make Wikimedia a useful set of tools supporting the Nawat language movement in a variety of ways. I do not consider the results to have been as satisfactory as I believe they should have been; it might be interesting to analyse the reasons for this partial failure, and pertinent to your project too, and that hope is what has spurred me to take the trouble to transmit to you the information in this email.
Here I will make no attempt at an exhaustive post mortem, but only give you the pertineint general background. The flagship project of the Nawat work I did on Wikipedia is the incubator project for a Nawat wikipedia ( https://incubator.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wp/ppl/Achtu_Iswat ). I worked to design a viable, attractive and useful project, creating the most basic and necessary "back end" pages, setting out specific guidelines which were intended to adapt the generic wikipedia model to the particular conditions and needs of our community, and I developed some content too. I was meticulous about creating help pages to guide and support potential editors, but was also eager to establish the requirement that only people with an adequate command of Nawat should be thinking about writing content, and one way to encourage that was to write a lot of the help texts in Nawat. This was meant to encourage other editors in the future, whom I not only encouraged to edit and add more content but helped with technicalities and linguistic support (cleaning up the grammar and spelling of their texts, for example).
The response was slow and halting but the dimensions and situation of the community must be brought into the equation before evaluating whether this project was "viable" and worthwhile; I believe that it was (and potentially is) in Nawat terms, though not perhaps when measured by generic wikipedia criteria. Although I am the main author of most of the articles, a few of those which bear my name were penned by somebody else who could not be persuaded to deal with the mechanics of uploading the article. It is a shame that by acting as surrogate editor in those instances the record of authorship is distorted a little; the same is true of some of the content in the Nawat news project too (see below).
Perhaps a workaround is needed to overcome this problem where an author of content may be somewhat or fully literate and perhaps somewhat computer-literate too, and willing to contribute content, but not without a helping hand when it comes to the actual uploading of the content, so that this can be performed in a way that permits proper attribution of responsibility to the real editor rather than making it appear that the assistant is the editor, and thus perhaps camouflaging the true diversity of content contributors.
Permission was never given to make this incubator project into an official wiki project, and I don't think we were anywhere near meeting the requirements for consideration.
We have such a small active language movement at present that I know a number of its members and can say with confidence that some people have found it useful. But I would describe the overall impact it has had so far as very limited, especially in proportion to what I see as its potential. Meanwhile, some people who potentially might have been more active in the Wikimedia projects are notably active on other social platforms with related purposes and interests. Perhaps we need to ask why.
Turning out attention to the Nawat language movement of which I speak, it may not fit neatly into the conventional "indigenous language movement" paradigm that is often assumed, so let me say a word about that.
Among native speakers, Nawat is a dying language, its remaining speakers nearly all aged and illiterate, and their command of Nawat also on the wane; yet there is a growing movement of young, intellectually able people with an ability and a desire to bring the language back and give it a new lease on life, who are serious enough in their endeavour to have successfully learnt the language well and created new structures for language recovery work including teaching the language to others, while also maintaining and building links with the traditional rural communities that are the language's natural and rightful heartland.
In the domain of language recovery processes, I would suggest that most features of the situation described are rather typical, whether or not that is acknowledged by conventional wisdom.
But at the same time, this is a striking and inspiring story in the context of the overall pessimism and impotence surrounding a great many indigenous languages today, the number of false starts and deceptions that plague and threaten authentic language recovery efforts today, and the extremely difficult social, political and econoimc conditions often confronting not only indigenous communities, though they first of all, but even their would-be benefactors and supporters in better-off sectors of society in the countries concerned.
For a fuller analysis of the kind of language movement I am talking about and its characteristics and motivations, see my essay "Pushing the Paradigm" ( http://tushik.org/pushing-the-paradigm/ ). A more academic version of this report is due to appear as a chapter of a major forthcoming book on indigenous language recovery to be published by Oxford University Press.
It is in these conditions and in the context described that it was hoped that Wikipedia would provide one platform among several that could be made to work in favour of the Nawat initiative.
My decision to create a Nawat Wikipedia was precipitated by an "emergency" situation that was brought to my attention by a colleague, who pointed out to me and others that such a project (a Pipil Wikipedia) already existed, but when we went to look at it we discovered that while the project existed in name, it had been set up and pages were being created by someone with no knowledge of the language who was either more or less making it up or filling it with pages in Classical Nahuatl (a distinct language). Thus what looked like a happy piece of news quickly turned into a source of worry, for a number of reasons which I won't bother reciting here.
Sadly, this is just one of the recurrent obstacles obstructing the path of indigenous language recovery work: false representation.
At the very least this had to be stopped; but there was also an opportunity here to have a real Nawat Wikipedia, which in fact had already been on our list of desiderata prior to these events but was just being reserved for the "right time".
We discussed the situation and promptly acted on it. I negotiated with the over-enthusiastic editor on Wikipedia who had (without malicious intent, but following an ill-advised strategy) committed the faux pas, and after other referees were brought in he was asked to refrain from continuing to "help". But as part of the "package" we negotiated, rather than attempt to get the false project deleted, it was determined that, in part to preempt such annoyances, we should turn it into a proper Nawat project. However, for this to be possible I asked for the false project to be reset to zero so that we could start properly and build from the ground up in a series of thought-out steps, not just aiming to "fill up" a Nawat encyclopedia but to ask what particular features it should have and how it should be developed strategically to make it both useful and indeed viable.
The result was the incubator project, a project which in practice I executed but which was geared to the needs and conditions of a real on-the-ground nascent language movement and at its disposition and, ultimately, control. This happened when the young Nawat language movement I have referred to was in its infancy and not really ready for this because we had other priorities, not least of which was the development of a robust written codification of the language and a sufficiently strong collective of well-trained literate Nawat speakers with access to the resources needed to both maintain and use such a project.
Although that process is still underway, in the years that have passed since the incubator project was undertaken we have come substantially closer to such a situation than at that time. Therefore, if we had not had our hand forced prematurely by the false start and had been allowed to do things in our own good time, I feel very confident that we would eventually have got around to doing this, probably better, with less effort and greater success.
This perhaps suggests a lesson for the future. There is a right time for things and a right way to go about them. Sweeping actions should not be taken without consultation by Wikipedia editors without links to (or even knowledge of) the language which, even when corrected, thereby pressure more competent groups into undertaking work that they are not quite ready for yet and who already have their hands full with work of a more urgent nature, thereby interfering with their schedule. Creating a spurious language project without proper background knowledge is reckless!
I recognise that it was done out of over-enthusiasm but it was a bad move nonetheless. I am also not advocating exceedingly exclusive restrictions on editing "rights" which would be contrary to the whole philosophy of Wikipedia, with which in general I identify. What I am advocating is something which I think has more to do with the general realm of common sense.
I have mentioned other Wikimedia projects involving Nawat, and one in particular to be noted was a subsequent project which was planned as a companion site of the Nawat wikipedia: a news site in Nawat. I maintained it for a period of time but was not able to keep it going on my own and failed to persuade other people to take the trouble to learn how to become fully fledged co-editors, and so it eventually became dormant although it is still there ( https://incubator.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wn/ppl/Achtu_Iswat ).
I think this was a good, attractive project which it would be worthwhile resurrecting, but I recognise that the mechanics of the way I had it set up (the editing procedure) need to be streamlined and updated; if I were to start over again I might consider designing it as a blog website instead. It might have been overambitious but it did have a lot to offer and aspired to use the tools available to provide the language communit with a good range of valuable textual material not hitherto available to it in Nawat anywhere.
Again, though, it would have needed a stronger active language community to sustain it. Perhaps it can still be considered a prototype and resumed in some guise at a future time. Subsequently this was actually partly replaced by a simpler blog project, Chachalaka ( http://chachalaka.blogspot.com.es/ ), which was specifically branded as a magazine-blog in EASY Nawat. Again, this offered a useful resource for Nawat language learners, but lack of long-term maintenance has resulted in it too becoming dormant.
Another issue that came up in my dealings with Wikimedia was that of the interface language.
I did participate in a project to translate the most important part of the Wikimedia interface into Nawat and actually got quite far along with it. But in the end, meeting the minimum requirements established by the people in charge of these things as a condition for allowing us to have the translated interface implemented turned out to be impractical. This culminated in a difference of opinion between myself and the committee in question.
I am a seasoned professional translator and not new to interface translation. I don't think there was a problem of incompetence on my part here, as I was strongly motivated to make this happen.
The trouble was with the rules. It was required that an initial list of about 500 messages had to be translated in their entirety just as a first phase before anything else could be done. I translated more than half of them (the easier and more useful half), but found that there were some that would not be of practical use and could have been left in Spanish, which was the template language, with little practical loss.
I also thought that in the case of a language such as Nawat for which appearance in such a context was completely novel and unprecedented, an incremental approach to interface translation was preferable for good methodological reasons. A gradual change was preferable, I argued, both for the users' sake (allowing them to get used to seeing elements of a Nawat interface gradually), and for the sake of the translator in order to "feel out" this completely new domain of language use and fine-tune the translations little by little in the process.
I approached a mediator and we discussed it; he put it to the committee and returned with their verdict: their answer was no, the rules were for everybody. So I abandoned the interface translation project. I hope this is all of some interest and utility, and am willing to continue discussing aspects that are considered relevant. Good luck with the project. Alan Alan R. King Email: alanrking@yahoo.comFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/alan.r.kingPersonal website alanrking.info NEW site for Nawat and Lenca language resources and indigenous language recovery: http://tushik.org/
From: Eddie Avila <eduardo13@gmail.com>To: languages@lists.wikimedia.org Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 12:13 AM Subject: [Languages] Wikimedia Grants Proposal - Strengthening Indigenous-Language Wikipedias in Latin America
Hi all - I’m reaching out to this list to those that might be interested in the proposal submitted by Global Voices to the Wikimedia Grants program. We’re very much open to improving the proposal and your feedback is welcome during this community input phase. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:Project/Strengthening_Indigenous-Lang... Looking forward to your thoughts on the Discussion Page or by email: eddie [at] globalvoices [dot] org Thanks! Eddie
Languages mailing list Languages@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/languages